CBRL GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): December 1, 2005
CBRL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
0-25225
|
|
62-1749513 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
305 Hartmann Drive, Lebanon, Tennessee 37087
(615) 444-5533
Check the appropriate box if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing
obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR.13e-4(c))
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
On December 1, 2005, CBRL Group, Inc. (the Company) issued the annual report supplement
that is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K, which by this reference is
incorporated herein as if copied verbatim, with respect to the fiscal year ending July 29, 2005.
The annual report supplement is posted on the Companys website, located at www.cbrlgroup.com.
Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
The information set forth in Item 2.02 above is incorporated by reference as if fully set
forth herein.
Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
(a) |
|
Financial Statements. None |
|
(b) |
|
Pro Forma Financial Information. None |
|
(c) |
|
Exhibits. |
|
99.1 |
|
Annual Report Supplement |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: December 1, 2005 |
|
CBRL GROUP, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
|
|
/s/ N.B. Forrest Shoaf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: |
|
N.B. Forrest Shoaf |
|
|
Title: |
|
Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel |
EX-99.1 ANNUAL REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL
Exhibit 99.1
CBRL Group, Inc.
Annual Report Supplement
Fiscal Year Ending July 29, 2005
Safe-Harbor Statement
The Company urges caution in considering its current trends and the earnings guidance disclosed in
this annual report supplement. The restaurant industry is highly competitive, and trends and
guidance are subject to numerous factors and influences, some of which are discussed in the
cautionary language that follows. The Company disclaims any obligation to update disclosed
information on trends or targets other than in its periodic filings on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K
(and any amendments to those forms) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Except for specific historical information, the matters discussed in this Annual Report Supplement,
as well as the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended July 29,
2005, contain forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and other factors which
may cause actual results and performance of the Company to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by these statements. All forward-looking information is provided by the Company pursuant
to the safe harbor established under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and
should be evaluated in the context of these factors. Forward-looking statements generally can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as assumptions, target, guidance,
outlook, plans, goals, objectives, expectations, near-term, long-term, projection,
may, will, would, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, believe, potential or
continue (or the negative or other derivatives of each of these terms) or similar terminology.
Factors which could materially affect actual results include, but are not limited to: the effects
of uncertain consumer confidence, higher costs for energy, consumer debt payments, or general or
regional economic weakness on sales and customer travel, discretionary income or personal
expenditure activity; the ability of the Company to identify, acquire and sell successful new lines
of retail merchandise; competitive marketing and operational initiatives; the ability of the
Company to sustain or the effects of plans intended to improve operational execution and
performance; commodity, workers compensation, group health and utility price changes; actuarial
estimate uncertainties with respect to self-insured workers compensation, general liability and
group health; changes in building materials and construction costs; the effects of plans intended
to promote or protect the Companys brands and products; the effects of increased competition at
Company locations on sales and on labor recruiting, cost, and retention; the availability and cost
of acceptable sites for development and the Companys ability to identify such sites; the ability
of the Company to open and operate new locations successfully; changes in foreign exchange rates
affecting the Companys future retail inventory purchases; consumer behavior based on negative
publicity or concerns over nutritional or safety aspects of the Companys products or restaurant
food in general; changes in or implementation of additional governmental or regulatory rules,
regulations and interpretations affecting tax, wage and hour matters, health and safety, pensions,
insurance or other undeterminable areas; practical or psychological effects of natural disasters or
terrorist acts or war and military or government responses; disruptions to the companys restaurant
or retail supply chain; the ability of and cost to the Company to recruit, train, and retain
qualified hourly and management employees; changes in interest rates affecting the Companys
financing costs; the actual results of pending, future or threatened litigation or governmental
investigations and the costs and effects of negative publicity associated with these activities;
implementation of new or changes in interpretation of existing accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP); effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting and disclosure; changes in capital market conditions that could affect
valuations of restaurant companies in general or the Companys goodwill in particular; and other
factors described from time to time in the Companys filings with the SEC, press releases, and
other communications.
Non-GAAP financial measures, as that term is defined by the SEC in Regulation G, are included in
this document. The reconciliations to GAAP measures are reflected in the Appendix at the end of
this document and are also available on our web site, cbrlgroup.com. Certain numbers in this
supplement are from the Companys audited financial statements, but readers should refer only to
the audited financial statements themselves to rely on audited results.
Financial Data
Financial information and data reported herein may include audited data or data extracted from
audited financial statements, but readers should not rely on such data as being audited unless
specifically so designated. For audited financial information or more detailed footnote
disclosure, the reader is encouraged to refer to the Companys periodic reports, which can be found
at the SECs Website, sec.gov, or the Companys website at cbrlgroup.com where these reports also
may be found.
2
Corporate Profile
CBRL Group, Inc. (CBRL, CBRL Group, our and we) (Nasdaq: CBRL) is a holding company whose
business is to own and develop established restaurant concepts. It is our objective to improve
shareholder returns by maximizing the long-term performance of our operating businesses and
optimizing the allocation of our capital. Drawing on the industry experience of our executive
team, the holding company provides the operating companies with management oversight, strategic
guidance, and leadership in organizational processes. The holding company is responsible for
capital structure strategies, investment of capital in operating business units and return of
excess capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. At the holding company, we
are also responsible for regulatory compliance and reporting, and for directing CBRLs corporate
affairs.
CBRLs two concepts are Cracker Barrel Old Country Store® (Cracker Barrel or CBOCS) and
Logans Roadhouse® (Logans). Cracker Barrel is an industry leader in the family-dining
segment. We expect to continue expanding Cracker Barrel at a moderate pace of approximately 5%
annual unit growth and to leverage long-term improvements in operating performance. Logans is an
emerging growth concept positioned in the roadhouse segment of casual dining, and we are planning
20% annual unit growth by the end of fiscal 2006. CBRL in recent years has generated cash from
operations well in excess of required investments in new property and equipment each year. We
expect this to continue over the long-term even with the increased annual investment in Logans
related to its anticipated growth rate. In recent years, we have returned a significant portion of
this cash generated by our operating businesses to our shareholders in the form of share
repurchases and dividends, and our long-term objective is to continue returning excess capital to
shareholders while maintaining our target capital structure and investment grade credit rating.
3
The Cracker Barrel Brand
Thirty-six years ago, Cracker Barrels founder, Dan Evins, recognized the potential to offer
interstate highway travelers quality food, service and value consistently and conveniently by
focusing on a mission of Pleasing People. The initial success of the concept drove continued
expansion along the interstate system, and today Cracker Barrel has evolved into an indelible part
of the family-travel experience. It is now one of the leading and most highly differentiated
restaurant chains in the United States. Cracker Barrel welcomes well over a half-million people
per day on average, serving meals for three dayparts and offering breakfast all day through its
more than 530 stores. Each location also has one of our unique retail shops that generated in
fiscal 2005 an average of more than $950,000 in retail sales, or over $450 per square foot of
retail selling space, driven primarily by the high level of restaurant guest traffic.
Cracker Barrel is a recognized guest favorite, having been named Best in Family Dining by
Restaurants and Institutions magazines Choice in Chains consumer survey for the 15th
consecutive year in 2005. For the 12th consecutive year, Cracker Barrel was named the
Best Restaurant Chain by a Destinations magazine poll, and the Good Sam Club named Cracker Barrel
the Most RV Friendly Sit-Down Restaurant in America for the 4th year in a row. As of
September 23, 2005, there were 534 Cracker Barrel stores in 41 states.
The Logans Roadhouse Brand
CBRLs other principal brand, Logans Roadhouse, is a growth opportunity in the appealing casual
roadhouse category. It was founded in 1991 and acquired by CBRL in 1999. Logans has broad appeal
serving generous
portions of moderately priced, high quality food in a casual, kickin atmosphere. Logans serves
lunches and dinners that feature steak (USDA choice, extra-aged and hand-cut on premises), ribs,
chicken and seafood, and its signature yeast rolls are made from scratch. A large part of the
Logans experience is the relaxed, fun atmosphere reminiscent of American roadhouses of the 1930s
and 1940s and accentuated by complimentary peanuts offered at every table and throughout the
restaurant where guests are encouraged to toss empty peanut shells on the floor. Logans endeavors
to create exciting, new highly craveable food items, and was recognized in 2005 with Nations
Restaurant News MenuMasters Award for Best Menu Revamp. Unlike Cracker Barrel, Logans serves
alcoholic beverages, reflecting less than 9% of Logans fiscal 2005 sales. As of September 23,
2005, there were 127 company-owned and 23 franchised Logans located in 19 states. A new
advertising program is being developed in fiscal 2006. Logans is also evaluating a new store
prototype for a planned rollout in fiscal 2007.
A New Culture of Continuous Incremental Improvement
During the late 1990s, as Cracker Barrel endeavored to maintain its strong, historical rate of
growth, a number of issues led, for a brief period of time, to deterioration in the Companys
performance. Opening new stores at a rate of 50 per year strained the Cracker Barrel system.
Aggressive menu pricing and tight management of restaurant expenses adversely affected the customer
experience at Cracker Barrel. As a result, during 1998 and 1999, Cracker Barrel experienced
declines in comparable store guest traffic in all but one quarter.
Cracker Barrel undertook a series of changes designed to reverse the declines in financial and
operational performance. Store expansion was slowed, and the site selection process was
overhauled. Investments in store labor and reductions in menu prices were implemented. Training
practices were improved, as were new-store real estate approval processes. Senior management
changes were made as well, resulting in charges incurred during 2000 due to a redirection of
management priorities.
During 2001, CBRL management decided to exit the three-location Carmine Giardinis gourmet market
and restaurant business that it had operated in Florida. The cost of exiting that business, along
with costs to close four underperforming Cracker Barrel and three underperforming Logans
locations, which had been opened or acquired during the rapid expansion period for both concepts in
the 1990s, led to additional charges at the end of 2001. In its 36-year history, Cracker Barrel
has an exceptional record of closing only eight stores (excluding one destroyed by a tornado)
because of poor performance.
4
Following these actions and the management focus towards achieving continuous incremental
improvement, financial results improved, and a new era of prudent and disciplined expansion has
been underway. Managements objective is continuous incremental improvement in operating and
financial performance as measured by sales, operating margins, and returns on both existing and new
capital invested in the business. Management encourages a culture of planning and measured risk
taking, and the Company has adopted internal best practices and industry-proven, low-risk
techniques and supporting technologies to pursue its goals.
Financial Highlights
After a period of rapid growth and acquisitions, CBRLs revenue and unit growth rates moderated,
and management has been focused on the Companys two core concepts.
|
|
|
Notes to chart: |
|
(a) |
|
Compound Average Growth Rate (CAGR) is used to show average annual growth rates over
extended periods of time to demonstrate long-term results |
|
(b) |
|
Fiscal years included 53 weeks; all other fiscal years included 52 weeks. |
|
(c) |
|
From 1998 to 2001, the Company operated Carmine Giardinis, a three-unit chain of gourmet
grocery stores and restaurants in Florida |
|
(d) |
|
Logans was acquired in February 1999 |
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Units |
|
1995 |
|
|
1996 |
|
|
1997 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
1999 |
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cracker Barrel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
Open |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Closed |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Unit Growth % |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logans Roadhouse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Open |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Closed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Annual Unit Growth % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.2 |
% |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carmines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
Open |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Closed |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Ending (Co. Owned) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
Annual Unit Growth % |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Franchise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Ending |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
6
The Company has demonstrated renewed growth in net income and diluted net income per share
(EPS) following management changes in 2000.
|
|
|
Notes and Reconciliations to Charts: |
|
(a) |
|
Excludes after-tax charge of $8.8 million ($0.15 per share) related to store
closures and includes 53rd week.
Including the effect of the charge (and 53rd week), net income was $63.5
million and EPS was $1.04. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes after-tax charges of $5.4 million ($0.09 per share) related to
management changes and refocused operating
priorities. Including the effects of charges, net income was $58.3 million and EPS was
$1.00. |
|
(c) |
|
Excludes after-tax charges of $24.5 million ($0.43 per share) related to store
closures, disposition of Carmine Giardinis and
accrual for a proposed settlement of litigation and includes 53rd week.
Including the effect of charges (and
53rd week), net income was $48.6 million and EPS was $0.85. |
|
(d) |
|
Excludes after-tax charge of $3.3 million ($0.06 per share) related to
settlement of litigation. Including the effects
of the charge, net income was $111.9 million and EPS was $2.12. |
7
The Companys solid balance sheet, including a high proportion of owned properties, and
conservative leverage position provides financial flexibility and liquidity. From 2000 through
2005 the Company achieved a 7.6% compound annual growth rate in total revenue while increasing
capital invested in the business at lower rates.
Consolidated Balance Sheet Highlights
($ Millions, except percentages and locations)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 - 2005 |
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
CAGR |
|
Fiscal years (Derived from Audited Financials) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,335.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,213.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,264.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,327.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,435.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,533.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
Memo: Total Revenue |
|
|
1,777.1 |
|
|
|
1,968.0 |
|
|
|
2,071.8 |
|
|
|
2,198.2 |
|
|
|
2,380.9 |
|
|
|
2,567.5 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
292.0 |
|
|
|
125.0 |
|
|
|
194.5 |
|
|
|
186.7 |
|
|
|
185.1 |
|
|
|
212.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
829.0 |
|
|
|
843.3 |
|
|
|
778.9 |
|
|
|
789.4 |
|
|
|
873.3 |
|
|
|
870.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GAAP capitalization |
|
|
1,121.0 |
|
|
|
968.3 |
|
|
|
973.4 |
|
|
|
976.1 |
|
|
|
1,058.4 |
|
|
|
1,082.2 |
|
|
|
-0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt to total capitalization % |
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Non-GAAP internal measure, unaudited)* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet long-term debt |
|
|
292.0 |
|
|
|
125.0 |
|
|
|
194.5 |
|
|
|
186.7 |
|
|
|
185.1 |
|
|
|
212.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate operating leases * |
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
206.8 |
|
|
|
232.2 |
|
|
|
254.7 |
|
|
|
271.7 |
|
|
|
291.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
360.5 |
|
|
|
331.8 |
|
|
|
426.7 |
|
|
|
441.4 |
|
|
|
456.8 |
|
|
|
503.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
829.0 |
|
|
|
843.3 |
|
|
|
778.9 |
|
|
|
789.4 |
|
|
|
873.3 |
|
|
|
870.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
1,189.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,175.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,205.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,230.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,330.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,373.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Total indebtedness to total capitalization % |
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Memo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned locations at year end |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Leased locations at year end |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Leases capitalized for internal capital structure measurement at 8 times last 12 months
rent expense, excluding shorter-term billboard rent (as disclosed in
financial statement footnotes) to approximate capitalized value of long-term lease
obligations, since the Company believes inclusion provides a more complete
reflection of long-term capital structure. |
After funding its capital expenditure needs (purchase of property and equipment) and higher
dividend payments (under the new dividend policy initiated in 2004) from operating cash flow, the
Company has been a generator of significant free cash flow (as defined below), which has been used
primarily for share repurchases. From 2000 through 2005 the Company generated $398 million in
free cash flow and spent $648 million on share repurchases.
Consolidated Cash Flow Highlights
($ Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Fiscal years (Derived from Audited Financials) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
59.0 |
|
|
$ |
49.2 |
|
|
$ |
90.4 |
|
|
$ |
105.1 |
|
|
$ |
111.9 |
|
|
$ |
126.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
Other cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
71.1 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
162.0 |
|
|
|
147.9 |
|
|
|
196.3 |
|
|
|
240.6 |
|
|
|
200.4 |
|
|
|
279.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(138.0 |
) |
|
|
(91.5 |
) |
|
|
(96.7 |
) |
|
|
(120.9 |
) |
|
|
(144.6 |
) |
|
|
(171.4 |
) |
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(22.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow * |
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
98.4 |
|
|
|
118.6 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
85.7 |
|
Net (reductions)/proceeds long-term debt ** |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
(167.2 |
) |
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
21.3 |
|
Share repurchases |
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
(36.4 |
) |
|
|
(216.8 |
) |
|
|
(166.6 |
) |
|
|
(69.2 |
) |
|
|
(159.3 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
59.6 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property and
equipment** |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
13.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
|
$ |
28.8 |
|
|
$ |
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Free cash flow is a GAAP-derived measure used by CBRL Group, Inc., which calculates
net cash generated by the business after purchase of property and equipment and payment of
dividends. |
|
** |
|
2001 includes $138.3 million of property sales related to a sale-leaseback transaction,
the proceeds of which were used to reduce long-term debt. |
8
|
|
|
* |
|
Market Capitalization is equal to total common shares outstanding multiplied
by the closing stock price on the last day of the
fiscal year as reported by Nasdaq. This data is as of the end of each fiscal year,
the most recent of which was July 29, 2005.
Readers are encouraged to obtain a recent stock quote. |
10
|
|
|
Notes and Reconciliations: |
|
(a) |
|
Excludes after-tax charges of $24.5 million related to store closures, disposition of Carmine Giardinis and accrual
for proposed settlement of litigation and includes
53rd
week. Including the effects of charges (and
53rd week),
ROIC, ROE and operating margin were 5.4%, 5.8% and 4.9%, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes after-tax charge of $3.3 million related to settlement of litigation. Including the effects of the charge,
ROIC, ROE and operating margin were 11.5%, 13.5% and 7.7%, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Return on Invested Capital = After-Tax Operating Income / Average beginning and ending Long-Term Debt +
Shareholders Equity |
|
(d) |
|
Return on Equity = Net Income / Average beginning and ending Shareholders Equity |
See Appendix for reconciliation of non-GAAP financial disclosures
CBRL Groups management believes that execution of its current strategies focused on careful
expansion and continuous incremental business improvements should enable the Company to continue to
generate ample funds for expansion, dividend payments and share repurchases. More specifically,
managements long-term corporate financial goals include:
|
|
|
v |
|
Low double-digit percentage total revenue growth driven
by approximately 5% unit expansion at Cracker Barrel, 20%
company-operated unit growth at Logans, and low to mid
single-digit percentage increases in comparable store sales
growth for both concepts |
|
|
|
v |
|
Operating profit growth outpacing revenue growth fueled
by greater operating leverage on higher sales, incremental
improvements in product costs at Cracker Barrel,
implementation of low-risk, industry-proven technologies and
management processes, and continuous incremental operating
improvements in both concepts |
|
|
|
v |
|
Diluted net income per share growth of 15% per year,
including the effect of share repurchases; excludes expected
one-time effects of implementing stock option expensing
beginning in fiscal 2006 |
|
|
|
v |
|
Total indebtedness (including capitalized value of real
estate operating leases) to total adjusted capital target
ratio of 36% |
|
|
|
v |
|
Investment grade credit rating maintained (currently
BBB-/Baa3 from Standard & Poors and Moodys,
respectively) . |
11
CBRL Group, Inc.
Table: Selected Financial Data (a)
(in thousands, except per share data and percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2004 |
|
|
|
|
August 3 |
|
Proforma |
|
August 2 |
|
August 1 |
|
July 30 |
|
Proforma |
|
July 29 |
Fiscal Years Ended |
|
2001 |
|
(b) (c) |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
(d) |
|
2005 |
Operating Statement Highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
1,967,998 |
|
|
$ |
1,967,998 |
|
|
$ |
2,071,784 |
|
|
$ |
2,198,182 |
|
|
$ |
2,380,947 |
|
|
$ |
2,380,947 |
|
|
$ |
2,567,548 |
|
Store operating income |
|
|
213,607 |
|
|
|
234,723 |
|
|
|
262,389 |
|
|
|
293,776 |
|
|
|
309,488 |
|
|
|
309,488 |
|
|
|
333,148 |
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
102,541 |
|
|
|
102,053 |
|
|
|
115,179 |
|
|
|
121,898 |
|
|
|
126,501 |
|
|
|
121,291 |
|
|
|
130,986 |
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
Amortization of goodwill |
|
|
14,370 |
|
|
|
3,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
95,634 |
|
|
|
128,697 |
|
|
|
147,210 |
|
|
|
171,878 |
|
|
|
182,987 |
|
|
|
188,197 |
|
|
|
202,162 |
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
12,232 |
|
|
|
12,232 |
|
|
|
6,769 |
|
|
|
8,819 |
|
|
|
8,439 |
|
|
|
8,439 |
|
|
|
8,597 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
84,464 |
|
|
|
116,465 |
|
|
|
140,441 |
|
|
|
163,059 |
|
|
|
174,548 |
|
|
|
179,758 |
|
|
|
193,565 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
34,852 |
|
|
|
43,442 |
|
|
|
49,997 |
|
|
|
57,951 |
|
|
|
62,663 |
|
|
|
64,533 |
|
|
|
66,925 |
|
Net income |
|
|
48,550 |
|
|
|
73,023 |
|
|
|
90,444 |
|
|
|
105,108 |
|
|
|
111,885 |
|
|
|
115,225 |
|
|
|
126,640 |
|
Net income per diluted share |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares
outstanding |
|
|
56,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,091 |
|
|
|
55,581 |
|
|
|
54,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,382 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,074 |
|
|
$ |
14,389 |
|
|
$ |
28,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,173 |
|
Working capital (deficit) |
|
|
(34,701 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,252 |
) |
|
|
(66,880 |
) |
|
|
(39,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,862 |
) |
Net property and equipment |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
1,040 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
Memo: Number of Owned Properties |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
443 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,213,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,264,673 |
|
|
|
1,327,165 |
|
|
|
1,435,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,533,272 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194,476 |
|
|
|
186,730 |
|
|
|
185,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,218 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
370,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485,792 |
|
|
|
537,803 |
|
|
|
562,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,284 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
843,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
778,881 |
|
|
|
789,362 |
|
|
|
873,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
869,988 |
|
Memo: Rent |
|
|
26,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,024 |
|
|
|
31,837 |
|
|
|
33,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
147,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
196,277 |
|
|
$ |
240,586 |
|
|
$ |
200,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,903 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
91,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,692 |
|
|
|
120,921 |
|
|
|
144,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,447 |
|
Share repurchases |
|
|
36,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,834 |
|
|
|
166,632 |
|
|
|
69,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,328 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
5,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,103 |
|
|
|
59,649 |
|
|
|
50,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,341 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
16,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return Highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on invested capital (e) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
12.4 |
% |
Return on equity (f) |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
Return on assets (g) |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
See Appendix for reconciliation to GAAP financial disclosures
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects restatements from changes in accounting for operating leases and contingently
convertible debt adopted in fiscal 2005 |
|
(b) |
|
The Company recorded charges of $33,063 before taxes, principally as a result of
exiting its Carmine Giardinis business, closing four Cracker Barrels and three Logans
units, and accruing for the proposed settlement of litigation. |
|
(c) |
|
The Companys fiscal year-ends on the Friday nearest July 31st and each quarter
consists of 13 weeks unless noted otherwise. The Companys fiscal year ended August 3,
2001 consisted of 53 weeks. |
|
(d) |
|
The Company recorded a charge of $5,210 before taxes in general and administrative expense
related to a litigation settlement. |
|
(e) |
|
Return on Invested Capital = After-Tax Operating Income / Average beginning and ending
Long-Term Debt + Shareholders Equity |
|
(f) |
|
Return on Equity = Net Income / Average beginning and ending Shareholders Equity |
|
(g) |
|
Return on Assets = After-tax Operating Income / Average beginning and ending Total
Assets |
Enhancing an Industry Leader
Financial Highlights
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001 |
|
FY 2002 |
|
FY 2003 |
|
FY 2004 |
|
FY 2005 |
Comparable Store Sales Increase (Total) (1) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Comparable Store Sales Increase (Restaurant) (1) |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Comparable Store Sales Increase/ (Decrease) (Retail) (1) |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
(2.7 |
%) |
Comparable Stores (1) |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
Total Operating Weeks |
|
|
23,049 |
|
|
|
23,187 |
|
|
|
24,308 |
|
|
|
25,501 |
|
|
|
26,804 |
|
Average Unit Volume ($000s) Total (2) |
|
|
3,919 |
|
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
4,202 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
Average Unit Volume ($000s) Restaurant (2) |
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
3,166 |
|
|
|
3,210 |
|
|
|
3,292 |
|
Average Unit Volume ($000s) Retail (2) |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
953 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
Average Check per Person (Comparable Restaurant) |
|
$ |
7.19 |
|
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
|
$ |
7.54 |
|
|
$ |
7.68 |
|
|
$ |
7.99 |
|
Average Daily Traffic (Restaurant) (3) |
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
Breakfast Sales as % of Total Restaurant Sales |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
Lunch Sales as % of Total Restaurant Sales |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
Dinner Sales as % of Total Restaurant Sales |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Retail Sales as % of Total Sales |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Average Sales per Square Foot (Retail) (4) |
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
$ |
452 |
|
|
$ |
472 |
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
Average Sales of Top 10% of Comp Stores ($000s)(5) |
|
$ |
5,580 |
|
|
$ |
5,655 |
|
|
$ |
5,604 |
|
|
$ |
5,698 |
|
|
$ |
5,702 |
|
Hourly Turnover Rate (6) |
|
|
151 |
% |
|
|
128 |
% |
|
|
113 |
% |
|
|
113 |
% |
|
|
112 |
% |
Managerial Turnover Rate (7) |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comparable stores are those open six full quarters at the beginning of the year
|
|
(2) |
|
AUV = Sales / Operating Weeks x 52 |
|
(3) |
|
AUV / Check / 364 |
|
(4) |
|
Average unit retail sales / 2,100 square feet of retail selling space per store |
|
(5) |
|
Average total sales for top 10% of comparable store group each year ranked by total sales
volume |
|
(6) |
|
Total hourly store employees terminating employment / 12-month average total hourly store
employees |
|
(7) |
|
Total store managers terminating employment / 12-month average total store managers |
Cracker Barrel Summary
|
|
|
v |
|
Highly differentiated brand with a unique country-cooking theme and country store retail shop |
|
|
|
v |
|
High guest traffic and opportunity for expanded retail sales from the captive traffic flow of restaurant guests |
|
|
|
v |
|
72% of locations owned (versus leased) as of the end of FY 2005 |
|
|
|
v |
|
Generated strong cash flow from operations in excess of capital expenditure needs, with relatively modest capital
expenditure needs for maintenance and replacement |
|
|
|
v |
|
Moderate annual unit growth rate of approximately 5%; identified potential to double the size of the system |
|
|
|
v |
|
Long-term objectives of continuous incremental operating improvement to expand operating margins and returns on
invested capital through application of proven industry techniques and practices and by leveraging the growth of
retail. |
14
Description of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
Over its 36-year history, Cracker Barrel has become one of the most recognized and highly
differentiated brands in the restaurant industry with a dominant position along the interstate
highway system. Cracker Barrel represents the largest component of CBRLs business, accounting for
86% of total revenue in fiscal 2005.
Each Cracker Barrel location features an old country-store style building decorated with authentic
antiques and country furnishings as well as nostalgic items reminiscent of and similar to those
found and sold in days gone by. Cracker Barrel locations are highly complex operations integrating
a high volume, high table-turn restaurant with a retail shop. The retail shop alone generated
nearly half a billion dollars in systemwide sales in fiscal 2005 by catering to the needs of a
captive base of restaurant guests.
The restaurants offer home-style country cooking featuring Cracker Barrels own recipes emphasizing
authenticity and quality. The menu features made-from-scratch products prepared from high-quality
ingredients at affordable prices, and the popular breakfast menu is served all day long. In fiscal
2005 Cracker Barrel unveiled new seasonal menus to add appealing, new limited-time offerings to the
base menu introduced late in fiscal 2004 that included daily dinner features. The holiday, winter,
spring, summer and fall seasonal menus included unique breakfast dishes, lunch and dinner entrées,
salads, sandwiches, desserts and beverages featuring characteristics and taste profiles associated
with each of the seasons.
We believe that the combination of restaurant and retail provides an important source of
differentiation for the Cracker Barrel brand. The retail shop, which occupies approximately 2,100
square feet of merchandise selling space, provides a place for restaurant guests to wait and an
opportunity for Cracker Barrel to add sales while guests wait, similar to the bar/waiting area at a
casual dining restaurant. Most retail customers are also restaurant guests and approximately
one-third of all transactions on average include a retail purchase. Each retail shop has
approximately 3,000 SKUs for sale at any given time, including a mix of year-round and seasonal
products. The Company has been expanding its merchandise lines to include more impulse-oriented
products at lower average price points, introducing a greater selection of product at price-points
under $20. Cracker Barrel also offers selected retail items for sale on the Cracker Barrel website
(crackerbarrel.com). Management believes Cracker Barrels annual sales average of $457 per square
foot of retail selling space compares favorably to other specialty
retailers. With an average of more than 1,100 dining guests per day being served in each Cracker
Barrel store, our goal is to build retail sales as a percentage of total sales by increasing the
frequency of purchase by this captive audience.
Leveraging its dominant interstate presence, Cracker Barrel uses outdoor advertising as its primary
advertising medium to reach travelers and tourists as well as local customers on the highway.
Cracker Barrel is the second-largest user of billboards for restaurant companies in the country and
is in the top 10 of billboard users overall. Outdoor advertising represents about 60% of
advertising expenditures. The Company also uses other types of media, including radio and print,
to increase brand awareness and build brand loyalty.
15
Cracker Barrel Recognized As Consumer Favorite
Cracker Barrel has been consistently recognized as a consumer favorite, receiving awards for guest
satisfaction and quality including:
|
|
|
v |
|
Best in Family Dining by Restaurants & Institutions Magazine 15 consecutive years; topped survey in
overall score and six of eight family dining categories: food quality, menu variety, value, service, atmosphere and
good reputation; second in cleanliness and tied for second in convenience |
|
|
|
v |
|
Best Restaurant Chain by Destinations Magazine 12 consecutive years |
|
|
|
v |
|
Welcome Mat Award as Best Restaurant in America by the Good Sam Club 4 consecutive years |
Another testament to the strength of the concept is the fact that in 36 years of operation and with
over 530 openings, only eight locations have been closed because of poor sales prospects without
being relocated within the same general market area. Another location was not rebuilt after being
destroyed by a tornado.
17
Cracker Barrel Guest Profile
Guest occasions at Cracker Barrel tend to skew towards guests that visit at least once per month,
and more than 35% of visits are travel-related, especially among lighter frequency users. Compared
with all full-service and family dining guests in the restaurant industry, Cracker Barrels guests
tend to be older. Thirty-eight percent of Cracker Barrel guests live in households with incomes
over $75,000, which exceeds both the full service industry average and the family dining average.
Cracker Barrel Guest Profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Full |
|
Family |
|
Cracker |
|
|
Service |
|
Dining |
|
Barrel |
Average Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Ages 35-49 |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
% Ages 50-64 |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
% Ages 65+ |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% < $35,000 |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
% between $35,000 - $74,999 |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
27 |
% |
% > $75,000 |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
Source: 2005 NPD CREST Survey
18
Although a lower percentage of guests consider Cracker Barrel to be conveniently located,
Cracker Barrel has the second highest percentage of guests that are current users (those who have visited in the
past three months) among a sampling of family and casual dining competitors, trailing only the
1,750 restaurant Applebees concept. These results demonstrate the relevancy and strong appeal of
Cracker Barrel for the local, non-traveling guest occasion.
19
Development Plans
Cracker Barrels locations are concentrated in the Southeast and Midwest, which are considered its
core markets. The Companys current new store development is focused in these markets and reflects
a strategy to increase its dominant presence along the interstates. Current plans are to expand
the number of Cracker Barrel stores by approximately 5% annually. We presently believe there is
the potential to expand in the future to more than double the current number of Cracker Barrel
locations without development of the West Coast, which we have yet to evaluate. Cracker Barrel is
testing and evaluating expansion at off-interstate locations, and we believe this strategy has
potential for future development. Cracker Barrel has also implemented a limited land banking
strategy to help secure high demand, premium sites in support of its moderate growth plans.
Cracker Barrels management uses a rigorous process to approve potential new store sites for
construction. Detailed information about a proposed site and the market surrounding it is gathered
and evaluated. A proprietary site selection model has been developed for Cracker Barrel based on
the performance of existing Cracker Barrel stores, and inputs for the model are updated annually.
Cracker Barrel develops and uses an internal-rate-of-return hurdle to evaluate discounted cash flow
expectations for each site. Cracker Barrel has a real estate committee, consisting of executives
from the primary functional areas and the holding company that meets, discusses and approves each
new site before it is acquired. Several key members of the committee also visit new sites as part
of the process for assessing sites and projecting sales before approval.
21
Focused Real Estate Development
System Build-out Potential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interstate |
|
Interstate |
|
Destination |
|
TOTAL |
Year-End FY 2005 Store Count |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total New Market Potential |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL BUILD-OUT POTENTIAL |
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
Unit Economics
The current Cracker Barrel store prototype is approximately 10,000 square feet including
approximately 2,100 square feet of retail gift shop selling space. The prototype has 194 seats in
the restaurant. Based on recent and projected new store development, the average cost for
approximately 2.5 acres of land for an average purchased site for a new Cracker Barrel store is
expected to be approximately $1.1 million (and generally expected to range between less than
$400,000 to $1.5 million). Development costs of a new restaurant are expected to be approximately
$2.5 million, including furniture, fixtures and equipment of approximately $630,000. Individual
site development costs, however, can vary materially from these estimates depending on local real
estate, site and construction conditions (and generally are expected to range between $2.2 million
and $2.9 million, excluding land). In addition, approximately $325,000 is budgeted for pre-opening
expenses. We typically project that a new Cracker Barrel store will generate annual sales of
approximately $4.2 to $4.4 million and mature store-level operating cash flow of approximately 20%
of sales (see the Appendix for reconciliation to a comparable GAAP measure). There are many
uncertainties in projecting new store investment and operating performance, and there can be no
assurance that projected results, either individually or in the aggregate, will be achieved.
Cracker Barrel plans to modify the prototype in fiscal 2005 to provide additional seating and
operational flexibility. Our plans reflect a higher percentage of purchased land than leased land
for the near future.
Cracker Barrel believes it has another unique strength in the inherent timelessness of its concept.
Because it is intended to evoke memories of a time gone by and an old country store, the locations
do not need periodic remodels to refreshen or update the concept that are typically necessary with
many restaurant concepts. In recent years, the Companys annual capital expenditures for repair
and replacement have been less than $30 million annually for repair and replacement capital
expenditures for the stores.
22
The country-store prototype can handle a very high level of guest traffic. Although Cracker
Barrels guest traffic is among the highest in our industry, at more than 1,100 guests on average
per day, the top 10% of stores have more than 33% higher sales than an average store.
Additionally, the highest volume unit in fiscal 2005 had restaurant sales nearly 75% above an
average store, all with substantially similar kitchens and dining room facilities.
Training and Development
Cracker Barrel views training and development of employees at all levels as a critical investment
to ensure successful execution of its complex and demanding store operations. Hourly training and
development is particularly important. Cracker Barrels hourly Personal Achievement Responsibility
program (PAR) is central to its efforts to train and motivate hourly store employees. The PAR
program, which has been in use since the early 80s, has four achievement levels within each
skill-position, with testing at each level to develop and document increasing proficiency in
skills. The opportunity to advance through the levels is coupled with the opportunity for
increased wages and reduced employee healthcare contributions. Ultimately upon reaching PAR IV
(the highest level) employees qualify for the same level of healthcare contributions from the
Company as company executives. Cracker Barrel believes that a core of experienced hourly
employees, especially PAR IV employees, is critical to consistent execution of store operations.
Cracker Barrels annualized turnover among PAR IV employees was only 27% in fiscal 2005. To
facilitate training in its stores, Cracker Barrel has an Employee Training Coordinator in each
store whose role is dedicated to training hourly store employees. A typical store also has a
dedicated training center. Cracker Barrels annualized turnover rate for all hourly store
employees has been falling over the past four years from 151% in fiscal 2001 to 112% in fiscal
2005. The stability of store leadership teams is another important contributor to managing hourly
turnover, and Cracker Barrels management turnover has fallen over the same time period from 25.2%
in fiscal 2001 to 22.0% in fiscal 2005.
Retail Distribution Center
Cracker Barrel has a single distribution center for its retail products located in Lebanon, TN that
serves each of its more than 530 stores with one delivery per week. Approximately 72% of Cracker
Barrels retail products are centrally purchased from vendors and warehoused at the distribution
center with the balance of retail products drop-shipped directly from vendors to its stores. The
distribution center is currently 381,000 square feet and could be expanded by another 100,000 feet
to meet the needs of a growing store base. The distribution centers inventory system receives
store replenishment orders automatically, and state-of-the-art picking systems direct order
fulfillment. Other facts about the distribution center include:
v |
|
Our third-party carrier operates a dedicated fleet of 60 tractors and 125 trailers making deliveries, serving
approximately 121 routes per week and approximately 20% more during peak season |
|
v |
|
8.2 million miles driven annually for deliveries and in support of inbound vendor shipments |
|
v |
|
Many trailers with Cracker Barrel logo, which are like moving billboards |
|
v |
|
Record pick 3.2 million pieces in a week during September 2004 |
|
v |
|
Upgraded sorter system implemented in March 2005 which more than doubles carton throughput capacity. |
Retail Sales Initiatives
Retail purchases are discretionary and almost exclusively made by our dining guests. We believe
our retail sales have been especially affected by higher gasoline prices and fixed household
expenditures, which we believe caused consumers to rein in their discretionary spending. Our
comparable store retail sales have been negative since late in
23
fiscal 2004, when a very strong
series of quarters ended just as gasoline prices began to escalate. The trends grew worse in early
fiscal 2006 as gasoline prices passed the $3.00 level.
We have been introducing a greater selection of retail product items at price points under $20,
including a growing number of music CDs by classic American artists and contemporary favorites. In
an environment where consumers are protecting their discretionary income, we continue to seek ways
to make the retail purchase decision easier for our guests by having desirable products at a good
value. Our sponsorship of the Alison Krauss and Union Station tour and the exclusive Home on the
Highways CD is the first of what we hope to be several exclusive audio offerings from major
performers. We recently announced exclusive recordings from Charlie Daniels and Sara Evans. We
have plans in place to keep the merchandise fresh, to improve the store layout, and to improve our
sourcing using a successful foreign trading company as our agent. We have added to the
merchandising, operations and planning teams, and the new leadership is focused on executing our
strategy.
Incentive Bonus Plans
Cracker Barrel has incentive compensation plans to focus store management on achievement of
financial objectives. The primary components of store management plans are directly linked to
improvements in sales and operating performance. Cracker Barrel awards 10% of store operating
income, as defined, to the management team to foster an ownership mindset. In addition,
performance bonuses are awarded for achievement of improved sales versus prior year and for
reaching food and labor targets. Cracker Barrel believes that a strong variable pay component is
important to attracting and retaining strong store management, and Cracker Barrel targets 40% or
more of total cash compensation for general managers and key field leaders to be comprised of
variable pay components. Multi-unit supervision and regional vice presidents also receive
incentive compensation based on performance of their units.
Corporate management incentive compensation plans are linked directly to achievement of company
financial targets including sales, operating income and operating margins. In addition, we have
long-term incentive plans for officers linked to achievement of operating income, sales and return
on invested capital and share ownership guidelines for certain senior officers.
Long-Term Operating Improvement and Margin Expansion Opportunities
Cracker Barrel management believes the Company has a number of key long-term opportunities to
improve operating performance, expand operating margins, and improve returns on invested capital.
Management believes that expansion of operating margins will be a key component. Cracker Barrel
plans to focus on continuous incremental improvement in operating margins and strategic
implementation of processes and technologies that have been proven in the restaurant and retail
industries but not historically utilized at Cracker Barrel. Management currently believes its key
long-term opportunities include:
v |
|
Enhancing the Cracker Barrel brand through market research and effective marketing |
|
v |
|
Improving operational excellence and guest satisfaction through regular feedback |
|
v |
|
Evolving menu and promotional strategies to sustain a broadened menu appeal while improving store-level execution |
|
v |
|
Ongoing product purchasing initiatives designed to optimize the number of product vendors, leverage purchasing volume,
minimize logistics and packaging costs, manage expected commodity trends and cycles, and expand bid processes while
maintaining or increasing the quality of products |
|
v |
|
Increasing frequency of retail purchases by restaurant guests and retail sales as a percent of total sales |
|
v |
|
Selectively increasing prices to offset cost inflation effectively, being careful to maintain the value behind our brand |
|
v |
|
Leveraging comparable store sales increases on fixed operating expenses |
|
v |
|
Implementing industry-proven restaurant design and process re-engineering initiatives to decrease wait and service
times, improve food quality and consistency and increase operating efficiency. |
24
Realizing the Growth Potential
Financial Highlights
Logans Roadhouse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2001 |
|
FY 2002 |
|
FY 2003 |
|
FY 2004 |
|
FY 2005 |
Comparable Store Sales (Decrease)/Increase(1) |
|
|
(1.1 |
%) |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Comparable Stores (1) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Operating Weeks |
|
|
3,906 |
|
|
|
4,238 |
|
|
|
4,792 |
|
|
|
5,353 |
|
|
|
6,137 |
|
Average Unit Volume ($000) (2) |
|
$ |
2,856 |
|
|
$ |
2,945 |
|
|
$ |
2,965 |
|
|
$ |
3,094 |
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
Average Check per Person (Comparable Restaurants) |
|
$ |
11.40 |
|
|
$ |
11.41 |
|
|
$ |
11.61 |
|
|
$ |
11.85 |
|
|
$ |
12.32 |
|
Average Daily Traffic (3) |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
Lunch Sales as % of Total Sales |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Dinner Sales as % of Total Sales |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
66 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
Alcohol Sales as % of Total Sales |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Average Sales of Top 10% of Comparable Stores(4) |
|
$ |
4,003 |
|
|
$ |
3,906 |
|
|
$ |
3,864 |
|
|
$ |
4,112 |
|
|
$ |
4,256 |
|
Hourly Turnover Rate(5) |
|
|
164 |
% |
|
|
138 |
% |
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
104 |
% |
|
|
109 |
% |
Managerial Turnover Rate(6) |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comparable stores are those open at least 18 months at the beginning of the year |
|
(2) |
|
AUV = Sales / Operating Weeks x 52 |
|
(3) |
|
AUV / Check / 363 |
|
(4) |
|
Average total sales for top 10% of comparable store group each year ranked by total sales
volume |
|
(5) |
|
Total hourly restaurant employees terminating employment / 12 month average total hourly
restaurant employees |
|
(6) |
|
Total restaurant managers terminating employment / 12 month average total restaurant managers |
26
Logans Summary
v |
|
Well-positioned concept with broad appeal and significant potential as a leader in the roadhouse segment of the casual
dining industry |
|
v |
|
A new marketing and advertising program is being developed and tested in fiscal 2006 to support a strategy of achieving
advertising leadership in the roadhouse segment in Logans markets |
|
v |
|
Annual unit growth rate of company-owned restaurants increasing to 20% by the end of fiscal 2006; focus on backfilling
markets to build operating and marketing efficiencies |
|
v |
|
New prototype opened early in fiscal 2006 and is being evaluated for potential rollout in fiscal 2007 |
|
v |
|
Long-term objectives of sustained expansion and improved returns on invested capital through leveraging comparable
store sales growth, achieving increased unit growth rate, managing trends in key commodity markets and evolving
business model to provide strong marketing and advertising support for the brand. |
Description of Logans Roadhouse
Founded in 1991, Logans was acquired by CBRL in 1999. Positioned in the expanding casual dining
industry, Logans provides a growth opportunity for CBRL as Logans becomes established as a leader
in the popular roadhouse segment and reaches planned 20% annual unit growth.
The Logans concept is designed to appeal to a broad range of guests by offering generous portions
of high quality food at value prices in a very casual dining environment that is lively and
entertaining. Logans menu features steaks, ribs, chicken, and seafood dishes in a distinctive
atmosphere. Logans restaurants are generally constructed of rough-hewn cedar siding with bands of
corrugated metal outlined in red neon. Interiors are decorated with murals and other artifacts
depicting scenes or billboard advertisements reminiscent of American roadhouses of the 1930s and
1940s. The menu emphasizes extra-aged, hand-cut on-premises USDA choice steaks and signature
dishes such as baked sweet potatoes and made-from-scratch yeast rolls. The relaxed and fun
atmosphere is enhanced by display cooking of grilled items, an old-fashioned meat counter and
buckets of complimentary roasted in-shell peanuts on every table, which guests are encouraged to
enjoy and let the shells fall on the floor. Logans also serves alcoholic beverages, which
represented less than 9% of sales in fiscal 2005.
A new leadership team was formed at Logans during fiscal 2004, combining experienced leaders from
outside the company with key leaders from the existing Logans management team. The focus of the
leadership team has been to enhance operational execution, sharpen the brand positioning, develop
advertising strategies, enhance the menu with new, kickin product offerings and develop a new
restaurant prototype. Logans has also been preparing for an increased rate of new unit growth,
with plans to achieve a 20% annual growth rate by the end of fiscal 2006.
Logans has a small base of franchised units, consisting of 23 locations at the end of fiscal 2005
operated by two franchisees in four states. The franchisees have rights to develop additional
restaurants in the states where they currently operate plus parts of Nevada and Oregon. Logans is
not currently planning any other franchising initiatives in the near future, although Logans
management believes additional franchising could become an opportunity in the future.
27
Logans Guest Profile
Logans guest profile reflects a concentration of frequent users who visit Logans twice a month or
more. Annual household incomes for Logans guests are primarily between $30,000 and $75,000, and
there is a significant segment of the customer base that describes itself as blue collar, particularly among frequent
users. With a comparably low average dinner check, Logans is positioned as an affordable, steakhouse for every
day of the week with high quality, high appeal offerings.
29
Developing a Media Strategy
Logans has begun developing and testing a new marketing and advertising program and believes that
the objective of achieving advertising leadership in its markets is an important priority for
establishing Logans as a leading brand in the roadhouse segment. Logans is beginning to use a
media strategy in a number of its markets, and increasing that proportion in future years will be
an important strategic objective.
Unit Economics
The current Logans primary restaurant prototype is approximately 8,200 square feet with 284 seats,
including 22 seats at the bar. Based on recent and projected new store development, the average
cost for approximately 1.7 acres of land for an average purchased site for a new Logans is
expected to be approximately $1.0 million to 1.5 million (and generally expected to range between
less than $900,000 to $2.2 million). Development costs of a new restaurant are expected to be
approximately $2.1 million to 2.2 million, including furniture, fixtures and equipment of
approximately $580,000. Individual site costs, however, can vary materially from these estimates
depending on local real estate, site and construction conditions. In addition, pre-opening
expenses of approximately $160,000 are budgeted. The Company typically projects annual sales for a
new Logans restaurant of approximately $3.0 million to $3.3 million and mature store-level
operating cash flow of approximately 19.5% of sales (see the Appendix for reconciliation to a
comparable GAAP measure). There are many uncertainties in projecting new store investment
and operating performance, and there can be no assurance that projected results, either
individually or in the aggregate, will be achieved. A new Logans prototype was recently developed
and the first unit opened in early August 2005. Regular openings of the new prototype are expected
to begin during fiscal 2007, and sales and cost estimates could vary in future months as the
Company constructs and evaluates units using the new prototype and its possible derivations. The
Company plans a higher percentage of leased land than purchased land for the near future.
Development Plans
Logans company-operated locations are concentrated in the South and Midwest. Logans growth plans
focus on building new restaurants to backfill existing markets, increasing operational and
marketing efficiencies and
30
growing brand awareness. Following a period of more modest expansion as the leadership team
focused on operational execution and brand sharpening, Logans is increasing the unit growth rate
with the goal of achieving 20% annual unit growth by the end of fiscal 2006. As mentioned above,
building media efficiencies over time is a key strategic objective that will continue to be an
important part of Logans development strategy.
Logans is developing a new restaurant prototype that highlights the brand elements developed under
the brand positioning initiatives. The new prototype is also expected to be more flexible
primarily by reducing building frontage and increasing kitchen layout efficiency. The first
restaurant with the new prototype has recently opened, and Logans expects to evaluate and enhance
the prototype in fiscal 2006 for use in fiscal 2007. In the interim, Logans will continue to use
the existing prototype to expand the Logans system to meet the strategic objectives of building
brand awareness and marketing efficiencies in existing markets. Logans believes that the existing
prototype can be adapted to incorporate key brand elements of the new prototype, and Logans plans
to test reimaging packages to introduce these elements into the existing restaurant base.
Logans management uses a rigorous process to approve potential new sites, reflecting many of the
best practices developed by Cracker Barrel. Detailed information about a proposed site and the
market surrounding it is gathered and evaluated. The Company develops and uses an
internal-rate-of-return hurdle to evaluate discounted cash flow expectations for each site.
Logans has a real estate committee, consisting of executives from the primary functional areas and
the holding company, who meet, discuss and approve each new site before it is acquired. Several
key members of the committee also visit new sites as part of the process for assessing sites and
projecting sales before approval.
Incentive Bonus Plans
Logans has incentive compensation plans to focus restaurant management on achievement of financial
objectives. The primary components of restaurant management plans are linked directly to
achievement of sales and operating performance targets. Logans plan is balanced between awards
for achievement of sales and operating income targets and food and hourly labor management
standards. Annual special awards are made for performance above sales and operating income
targets. Logans believes that a significant variable pay component provides an important
incentive for achieving company objectives and for attracting and retaining strong restaurant
management. Multi-unit supervision positions and regional vice presidents also receive incentive
compensations based on performance of their units.
Corporate management incentive compensation plans are linked directly to achievement of company
financial targets including sales, operating income and operating margins. In addition, we have
long-term incentive plans for officers linked to achievement of operating income, sales and return
on invested capital and share ownership guidelines for certain senior officers.
Long-Term Growth Opportunities
CBRL and Logans management teams believe that Logans has an opportunity to contribute
significantly to growth in CBRLs revenue and operating profits over time through expansion and
successful execution of Logans brand strategies. Management believes the key long-term
opportunities for growth include:
v |
|
Growth in comparable store sales through implementation of
marketing and advertising strategies, an ongoing operational
execution focus, and menu and product development initiatives |
v |
|
Plans for 20% annual unit growth rate by the end of fiscal 2006 |
31
v |
|
Enhanced alcohol offerings to build alcohol sales responsibly,
building on Happy Hour program, development of new signature
drinks and the use of long neck beers as a key element of the
brand image |
|
v |
|
Long-term incremental margin improvements from leveraging sales
growth and realizing other identified operating efficiencies which
are expected to be partly offset in the near-term by relatively
high beef prices and over time by an increase in advertising
spending. |
32
Reconciliation of non-GAAP financials to GAAP disclosures
Effects of Charges
As reported in the Companys annual consolidated financial statements, the Company has taken
certain charges to earnings. Since these charges were considered infrequent in nature and related
to changes undertaken as part of changes in focus and priorities, or to settle long-standing
litigation, the Company is showing net income and diluted net income per share results excluding
the effects of these charges to improve the comparability of year-to-year results. Reconciliation
for the effect of charges on each of the GAAP financial disclosures to the non-GAAP financials used
in this supplemental analysis is shown below, and more detail of these charges may be found in the
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys Forms 10-K filed with the SEC.
FY 1996 Charges
In FY 1996, the Company incurred charges related to the closure of three Cracker Barrel stores and
discontinuance of the Cracker Barrel Corner Market concept. The charges totaled $14.2 million
before income taxes and $8.8 million after the effect of income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions except per share data) |
|
Net Income |
|
|
Diluted Net Income Per Share |
|
GAAP Financial Disclosure |
|
$ |
63.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.04 |
|
Add back effect of Charges |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measure |
|
$ |
72.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
FY 2000 Charges
In FY 2000, the Company incurred charges related to management changes and refocused operating
priorities. Charges totaled $8.6 million before income taxes and $5.3 million after the effect of
income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions except per share data) |
|
Net Income |
|
|
Diluted Net Income Per Share |
|
GAAP Financial Disclosure |
|
$ |
58.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
Add back effect of Charges |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measure |
|
$ |
63.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
FY 2001 Charges
In FY 2001, the Company incurred charges related to discontinuance of its Carmine Giardinis
Gourmet Market business as well as the closure of four Cracker Barrel stores and three Logans
restaurants, and an accrual for proposed settlement of litigation. Charges totaled $33.1 million
before income taxes and $24.5 million after the effect of income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions except per share data) |
|
Net Income |
|
|
Diluted Net Income Per Share |
|
GAAP Financial Disclosure |
|
$ |
48.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
Add back effect of Charges |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measure |
|
$ |
73.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
FY 2004 Charges
In FY 2004, the Company incurred a charge related to a settlement of certain lawsuits against the
Companys Cracker Barrel subsidiary. The charge totaled $5.2 million before income taxes and $3.3
million after the effect of income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions) |
|
Net Income |
|
|
Diluted Net Income Per Share |
|
GAAP Financial Disclosure |
|
$ |
111.9 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
Add back effect of Charges |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measure |
|
$ |
115.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
33
Total Indebtedtness to Total Capitalization
The Company uses a non-GAAP measure of indebtedness to total capital for internal purposes. Since
many companies in the restaurant and retail industry make significant use of real estate operating
leases to finance land for locations, the Company believes that use of a measure that reflects
these obligations provides a more complete representation of the Companys indebtedness as a target
for its capital structure. Reconciliation to the GAAP-derived Total Debt to Total Capitalization
ratio is provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP-Derived Financial Measures |
|
FY 01 |
|
|
FY 02 |
|
|
FY 03 |
|
|
FY 04 |
|
|
FY 05 |
|
Balance sheet long-term debt |
|
$ |
125.0 |
|
|
$ |
194.5 |
|
|
$ |
186.7 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
$ |
212.2 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
843.3 |
|
|
|
778.9 |
|
|
|
789.4 |
|
|
|
873.3 |
|
|
|
870.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
968.3 |
|
|
|
973.4 |
|
|
|
976.1 |
|
|
|
1,058.4 |
|
|
|
1,082.2 |
|
Memo: Average of beginning
and end of fiscal year |
|
$ |
1,043.6 |
|
|
$ |
970.8 |
|
|
$ |
974.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,017.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,070.3 |
|
Total debt to total capitalization |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions except percentages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measures |
|
FY 01 |
|
|
FY 02 |
|
|
FY 03 |
|
|
FY 04 |
|
|
FY 05 |
|
Balance sheet long-term debt |
|
$ |
125.0 |
|
|
$ |
194.5 |
|
|
$ |
186.7 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
$ |
212.2 |
|
Capitalized operating leases* |
|
|
206.8 |
|
|
|
232.2 |
|
|
|
254.7 |
|
|
|
271.7 |
|
|
|
291.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total indebtedness |
|
|
331.8 |
|
|
|
426.7 |
|
|
|
441.4 |
|
|
|
456.8 |
|
|
|
503.8 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
843.3 |
|
|
|
778.9 |
|
|
|
789.4 |
|
|
|
873.3 |
|
|
|
870.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization |
|
$ |
1,175.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,205.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,218.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,319.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,373.8 |
|
Memo: Average of beginning
and end of fiscal year |
|
$ |
1,183.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,185.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,205.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,269.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,346.8 |
|
Total indebtedness to total capitalization |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
35.4 |
% |
|
|
35.9 |
% |
|
|
34.3 |
% |
|
|
36.7 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
8 times last 12 months rent expense, excluding shorter-term billboard rent, which the
Company believes to be an operating commitment and not a capital commitment (as disclosed in
the Companys financial statements), to approximate the capitalized value of long-term
operating lease obligations. |
Store-Level Operating Cash Flow
The Company uses store-level operating cash flow internally as a measure of direct operating
performance at the store level, exclusive of the impact of the relative age of asset base and how
those assets were acquired (e.g., leased vs. owned), the effect of depreciation accounting methods,
and the effect of indirect or allocated expenses (e.g., the cost of multi-unit store supervision).
Because the Company does not report individual store performance with an allocation of indirect
costs there is not a comparable GAAP measure other than the consolidated results of operation, in
which these indirect costs, location rent as opposed to billboard rent, and depreciation and
amortization are additional deductions from sales used in calculating store operating income, a
consolidated GAAP measure. Also, store operating income as reported in the consolidated financial
statements includes franchise revenues that also are not allocated in the calculation of store
level operating cash flow.
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow is a GAAP-derived measure that the Company uses internally to evaluate its
cash-generating performance. Derivation of the measure is described on the related charts. It
reflects cash provided by operating activities less outlays for purchase of property and equipment
and dividend payments. Free cash flow is a measure of net cash available for other purposes such
as share repurchases.
34
After-Tax Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 01 |
|
|
FY 02 |
|
|
FY 03 |
|
|
FY 04 |
|
|
FY 05 |
|
Operating Income |
|
$ |
95.6 |
|
|
$ |
147.2 |
|
|
$ |
171.9 |
|
|
$ |
183.0 |
|
|
$ |
202.2 |
|
Less taxes at effective tax rate |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
52.4 |
|
|
|
61.0 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After-Tax Operating Income |
|
$ |
55.8 |
|
|
$ |
94.8 |
|
|
$ |
110.9 |
|
|
$ |
117.3 |
|
|
$ |
132.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma(a) |
|
|
Pro Forma(b) |
|
|
|
FY 01 |
|
|
FY 04 |
|
Pro Forma Operating Income |
|
$ |
128.7 |
|
|
$ |
188.2 |
|
Less taxes at effective tax rate |
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma After-Tax Operating
Income |
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
|
$ |
120.6 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Operating income excludes $33.1 million (before tax) effect of charges described above |
|
(b) |
|
Operating income excludes $5.2 million (before tax) effect of charge described above |
35