UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
x
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended October 28, 2011
OR
|
|
o
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from _____________ to _____________
Commission file number: 001-25225
____________________________________
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Tennessee
|
62-1749513
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
305 Hartmann Drive, P.O. Box 787
Lebanon, Tennessee
|
37088-0787
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip code)
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (615) 444-5533
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Sec. 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company ¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
22,949,548 Shares of Common Stock
Outstanding as of November 16, 2011
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended October 28, 2011
INDEX
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Page
|
|||
|
Item 1
|
||||
|
·
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|||
|
a)
|
3
|
|||
|
b)
|
4
|
|||
|
c)
|
5
|
|||
|
d)
|
6
|
|||
|
Item 2
|
||||
|
·
|
14
|
|||
|
Item 3
|
||||
|
·
|
26
|
|||
|
Item 4
|
||||
|
·
|
26
|
|||
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
|
Item 1A
|
||||
|
·
|
27
|
|||
|
Item 6
|
||||
|
·
|
27
|
|||
|
28
|
||||
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
ASSETS
|
October 28,
2011
|
July 29,
2011*
|
||||||
|
Current Assets:
|
||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 49,771 | $ | 52,274 | ||||
|
Property held for sale
|
950 | 950 | ||||||
|
Accounts receivable
|
16,187 | 12,279 | ||||||
|
Income taxes receivable
|
-- | 7,898 | ||||||
|
Inventories
|
160,668 | 141,547 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
12,704 | 9,000 | ||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
21,541 | 21,967 | ||||||
|
Total current assets
|
261,821 | 245,915 | ||||||
|
Property and equipment
|
1,690,936 | 1,673,873 | ||||||
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization of capital leases
|
678,942 | 664,709 | ||||||
|
Property and equipment – net
|
1,011,994 | 1,009,164 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
54,113 | 55,805 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 1,327,928 | $ | 1,310,884 | ||||
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
|
Current Liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable
|
$ | 101,467 | $ | 99,679 | ||||
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and other long-term obligations
|
4,812 | 123 | ||||||
|
Income taxes payable
|
1,241 | -- | ||||||
|
Accrued interest expense
|
10,177 | 7,857 | ||||||
|
Other current liabilities
|
157,910 | 159,444 | ||||||
|
Total current liabilities
|
275,607 | 267,103 | ||||||
|
Long-term debt
|
545,429 | 550,143 | ||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability
|
47,342 | 51,604 | ||||||
|
Other long-term obligations
|
98,351 | 105,661 | ||||||
|
Deferred income taxes
|
67,738 | 68,339 | ||||||
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13)
|
||||||||
|
Shareholders’ Equity:
|
||||||||
|
Preferred stock – 100,000,000 shares of $.01 par value authorized; no shares issued
|
-- | -- | ||||||
|
Common stock – 400,000,000 shares of $.01 par value authorized; 22,917,135 shares issued and outstanding at October 28, 2011, and 22,840,974 shares issued and outstanding at July 29, 2011
|
229 | 228 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
10,533 | 7,081 | ||||||
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(34,082 | ) | (38,032 | ) | ||||
|
Retained earnings
|
316,781 | 298,757 | ||||||
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
293,461 | 268,034 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 1,327,928 | $ | 1,310,884 | ||||
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
* This Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet has been derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 29, 2011, as filed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2011.
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$ | 598,437 | $ | 598,691 | ||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
186,307 | 179,753 | ||||||
|
Gross profit
|
412,130 | 418,938 | ||||||
|
Labor and related expenses
|
220,968 | 224,604 | ||||||
|
Other store operating expenses
|
109,044 | 111,959 | ||||||
|
Store operating income
|
82,118 | 82,375 | ||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
37,494 | 36,876 | ||||||
|
Impairment and store dispositions, net
|
-- | 83 | ||||||
|
Operating income
|
44,624 | 45,416 | ||||||
|
Interest expense
|
11,135 | 11,714 | ||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
33,489 | 33,702 | ||||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
9,687 | 9,968 | ||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 23,802 | $ | 23,734 | ||||
|
Net income per share:
|
||||||||
|
Basic
|
$ | 1.04 | $ | 1.04 | ||||
|
Diluted
|
$ | 1.03 | $ | 1.01 | ||||
|
Weighted average shares:
|
||||||||
|
Basic
|
22,870,934 | 22,832,393 | ||||||
|
Diluted
|
23,145,783 | 23,593,882 | ||||||
|
Dividends declared per share
|
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.22 | ||||
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited and in thousands)
|
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 23,802 | $ | 23,734 | ||||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
15,453 | 15,027 | ||||||
|
Loss on disposition of property and equipment
|
502 | 792 | ||||||
|
Share-based compensation
|
2,547 | 2,462 | ||||||
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
(83 | ) | (838 | ) | ||||
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Inventories
|
(19,121 | ) | (21,711 | ) | ||||
|
Other current assets
|
286 | (1,843 | ) | |||||
|
Accounts payable
|
1,788 | (14,591 | ) | |||||
|
Other current liabilities
|
1,350 | (15,588 | ) | |||||
|
Other long-term assets and liabilities
|
(6,280 | ) | 2,619 | |||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities
|
20,244 | (9,937 | ) | |||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(18,778 | ) | (18,177 | ) | ||||
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
107 | 196 | ||||||
|
Proceeds from insurance recoveries of property and equipment
|
66 | 24 | ||||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(18,605 | ) | (17,957 | ) | ||||
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
92,600 | 86,200 | ||||||
|
Principal payments under long-term debt and other long-term obligations
|
(92,630 | ) | (87,943 | ) | ||||
|
Proceeds from exercise of share-based compensation awards
|
823 | 10,307 | ||||||
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation
|
83 | 838 | ||||||
|
Dividends on common stock
|
(5,018 | ) | (4,547 | ) | ||||
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(4,142 | ) | 4,855 | |||||
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(2,503 | ) | (23,039 | ) | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
52,274 | 47,700 | ||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 49,771 | $ | 24,661 | ||||
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
|
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
|
$ | 8,252 | $ | 11,066 | ||||
|
Income taxes
|
$ | 297 | $ | 6,463 | ||||
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activity:
|
||||||||
|
Change in fair value of interest rate swap
|
$ | 4,262 | $ | (2,166 | ) | |||
|
Change in deferred tax asset for interest rate swap
|
$ | (312 | ) | $ | 2,349 | |||
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except percentages and share data)
(Unaudited)
|
1.
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and its affiliates (collectively, in the Notes, the “Company”) are principally engaged in the operation and development in the United States of the Cracker Barrel Old Country Store® (“Cracker Barrel”) concept.
The condensed consolidated balance sheets at October 28, 2011 and July 29, 2011 and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the quarters ended October 28, 2011 and October 29, 2010, have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring items) necessary for a fair presentation of such condensed consolidated financial statements have been made. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 29, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”). The accounting policies used in preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements are the same as described in the 2011 Form 10-K. References in these Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements to a year are to the Company’s fiscal year unless otherwise noted.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended accounting guidance which provides additional guidance on how to determine fair value under existing standards and expands existing disclosure requirements on a prospective basis. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this accounting guidance in the third quarter of 2012 will have a significant impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued amended accounting guidance which requires companies to present total comprehensive income and its components and the components of net income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two consecutive statements reporting net income and comprehensive income. This requirement eliminates the option to present components of comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. This guidance affects only the presentation of comprehensive income and does not change the components of comprehensive income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 on a retrospective basis. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this accounting guidance in the first quarter of 2013 will have a significant impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
2.
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at October 28, 2011 were as follows:
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Fair Value as
of October 28,
2011
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents*
|
$ | 27,325 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 27,325 | ||||||||
|
Deferred compensation plan assets**
|
28,251 | -- | -- | 28,251 | ||||||||||||
|
Total assets at fair value
|
$ | 55,576 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 55,576 | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability (see Note 5)
|
$ | -- | $ | 47,342 | $ | -- | $ | 47,342 | ||||||||
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
$ | -- | $ | 47,342 | $ | -- | $ | 47,342 | ||||||||
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at July 29, 2011 were as follows:
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Fair Value as
of July 29,
2011
|
|||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents*
|
$ | 29,548 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 29,548 | ||||||||
|
Deferred compensation plan assets**
|
29,665 | -- | -- | 29,665 | ||||||||||||
|
Total assets at fair value
|
$ | 59,213 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 59,213 | ||||||||
|
Interest rate swap liability (see Note 5)
|
$ | -- | $ | 51,604 | $ | -- | $ | 51,604 | ||||||||
|
Total liabilities at fair value
|
$ | -- | $ | 51,604 | $ | -- | $ | 51,604 | ||||||||
*Consists of money market fund investments.
**Represents plan assets invested in mutual funds established under a Rabbi Trust for the Company’s non-qualified savings plan and is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as other assets.
The Company’s money market fund investments and deferred compensation plan assets are measured at fair value using quoted market prices. The fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap liability is determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows. Since the Company’s interest rate swap values are based on the LIBOR forward curve, which is observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the swaps, it is considered a Level 2 input. Nonperformance risk is reflected in determining the fair value of the interest rate swaps by using the Company’s credit spread less the risk-free interest rate, both of which are observable at commonly quoted intervals for the terms of the swaps. Thus, the adjustment for nonperformance risk is also considered a Level 2 input.
The fair values of the Company’s accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts because of their short duration. The fair value of the Company’s variable rate debt, based on quoted market prices, approximates its carrying amount at October 28, 2011 and July 29, 2011.
|
3.
|
Inventories
|
Inventories were comprised of the following at:
|
October 28,
2011
|
July 29,
2011
|
|||||||
|
Retail
|
$ | 125,295 | $ | 108,829 | ||||
|
Restaurant
|
20,421 | 19,200 | ||||||
|
Supplies
|
14,952 | 13,518 | ||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 160,668 | $ | 141,547 | ||||
|
4.
|
Debt
|
Long-term debt consisted of the following at:
|
October 28,
2011
|
July 29,
2011
|
|||||||
|
Revolving credit facility expiring on July 8, 2016
|
$ | 318,750 | $ | 318,750 | ||||
|
Term loan payable on or before July 8, 2016
|
231,250 | 231,250 | ||||||
|
Note payable
|
220 | 246 | ||||||
| 550,220 | 550,246 | |||||||
|
Current maturities
|
(4,791 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||
|
Long-term debt
|
$ | 545,429 | $ | 550,143 | ||||
The Company’s $750,000 credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consists of a term loan and a $500,000 revolving credit facility (“the Revolving Credit Facility”). At October 28, 2011, the Company had $318,750 outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility. At October 28, 2011, the Company had $28,706 of standby letters of credit, which reduce the Company’s availability under the Revolving Credit Facility (see Note 13). At October 28, 2011, the Company had $152,544 in borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility.
In accordance with the Credit Facility, outstanding borrowings bear interest, at the Company’s election, either at LIBOR or prime plus a percentage point spread based on certain specified financial ratios. As of October 28, 2011, the Company’s outstanding borrowings were swapped at weighted average interest rates of 7.57% (see Note 5 for information on the Company’s interest rate swaps).
The Credit Facility contains customary financial covenants, which are specified in the agreement and include maintenance of a maximum consolidated total leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. At October 28, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
The Credit Facility also imposes restrictions on the amount of dividends the Company is able to pay. If there is no default then existing and the total of our availability under the Revolving Credit Facility plus the Company’s cash and cash equivalents on hand is at least $100,000, the Company may: (1) pay cash dividends on its common stock if the aggregate amount of dividends paid in any fiscal year is less than 15% of Consolidated EBITDA from continuing operations (as defined in the Credit Facility) during the immediately preceding fiscal year; or (2) increase its regular quarterly cash dividend in any quarter by an amount not to exceed the greater of $.01 per share or 10% of the amount of the dividend paid in the prior fiscal quarter.
The note payable consists of a five-year note with a vendor with an original principal amount of $507 and represents the financing of prepaid maintenance for telecommunications equipment. The note payable is payable in monthly installments of principal and interest of $9 through October 16, 2013 and bears interest at 2.88%.
|
5.
|
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
The Company has interest rate risk relative to its outstanding borrowings, which bear interest at the Company’s election either at the prime rate or LIBOR plus a percentage point spread based on certain specified financial ratios under the Credit Facility (see Note 4). The Company’s policy has been to manage interest cost using a mix of fixed and variable rate debt. To manage this risk in a cost efficient manner, the Company uses derivative instruments, specifically interest rate swaps.
On May 4, 2006, the Company entered into an interest rate swap (the “2006 swap”) in which it agreed to exchange with a counterparty, at specified intervals effective August 3, 2006, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed-upon notional principal amount. The swapped portion of the outstanding debt or notional amount of the 2006 swap over its remaining life is as follows:
|
From May 3, 2011 to May 2, 2012
|
$ | 550,000 | ||
|
From May 3, 2012 to May 3, 2013
|
525,000 |
The 2006 swap was accounted for as a cash flow hedge and expires in May 2013. The rate on the portion of the Company’s outstanding debt covered by the 2006 swap is fixed at a rate of 5.57% plus the Company’s credit spread over the 7-year life of the 2006 swap. The Company’s weighted average credit spread at October 28, 2011 was 2.00%.
On August 10, 2010, the Company entered into a second interest rate swap (the “2010 swap”) in which it agreed to exchange with a counterparty, effective May 3, 2013, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to the notional principal amount of $200,000. The 2010 swap was also accounted for as a cash flow hedge. The rate on the portion of the Company’s outstanding debt covered by the 2010 swap will be fixed at a rate of 2.73% plus the Company’s credit spread over the 2-year life of the 2010 swap.
On July 25, 2011, the Company entered into two additional interest rate swaps; one with a 2-year life (the “2011 2-year swap”) and one with a 3-year life (the “2011 3-year swap”). For both of these interest rate swaps, the Company agreed to exchange with counterparties, effective May 3, 2013, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to the notional principal amount of $50,000 for each interest rate swap. These interest rate swaps were also accounted for as cash flow hedges. The rates on the portion of the Company’s outstanding debt covered by the 2011 2-year swap and 2011 3-year swap will be fixed at 2.00% and 2.45%, respectively, plus the Company’s credit spreads over the respective lives of the interest rate swaps.
Additionally, on September 19, 2011, the Company entered into two interest rate swaps. For both of these interest rate swaps, the Company agreed to exchange with counterparties, effective May 3, 2013, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated by reference to the notional principal amount of $25,000 for each interest rate swap. These interest rate swaps were also accounted for as cash flow hedges. The rate on the portion of the Company’s outstanding debt covered by these swaps will be fixed at a rate of 1.05% plus the Company’s credit spread over the 2-year life of each swap.
Companies may elect whether or not to offset related assets and liabilities and report the net amount on their financial statements if the right of setoff exists. Under a master netting agreement, the Company has the legal right to offset the amounts owed to the Company against amounts owed by the Company under a derivative instrument that exists between the Company and a counterparty.
The Company does not hold or use derivative instruments for trading purposes. The Company also does not have any derivatives not designated as hedging instruments and has not designated any non-derivatives as hedging instruments.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments as of October 28, 2011 and July 29, 2011 were as follows:
|
Asset
|
Liability
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Balance Sheet
Location
|
October 28,
2011
|
July 29,
2011
|
October 28,
2011
|
July 29,
2011
|
|||||||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps*
(See Note 2)
|
Interest rate swap liability
|
$ | 104 | $ | -- | $ | 47,446 | $ | 51,604 | ||||||||
*The Company’s interest rate swaps are subject to a master netting agreement and are presented on a net basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
When the Company is engaged in more than one outstanding derivative transaction with the same counterparty and also has a legally enforceable master netting agreement with that counterparty, its credit risk exposure is based on the net exposure under the master netting agreement. If, on a net basis, the Company owes the counterparty, the Company regards its credit exposure to the counterparty as being zero.
The estimated fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap liability incorporates the Company’s non-performance risk (see Note 2). The adjustment related to the Company’s non-performance risk at October 28, 2011 and July 29, 2011 resulted in reductions of $1,941 and $1,546, respectively, in the fair value of the interest rate swap liability. The offset to the interest rate swap liability is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”), net of the deferred tax asset, and will be reclassified into earnings over the term of the underlying debt. As of October 28, 2011, the estimated pre-tax portion of AOCL that is expected to be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months is $27,641. Cash flows related to the interest rate swap are included in interest expense and in operating activities.
The following table summarizes the pre-tax effects of the Company’s derivative instrument on AOCL for the quarter ended October 28, 2011 and the year ended July 29, 2011:
|
Amount of Income Recognized in AOCL on
Derivatives (Effective Portion)
|
||||||||
|
Quarter Ended
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||
|
October 28, 2011
|
July 29, 2011
|
|||||||
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
$ | 4,262 | $ | 14,677 | ||||
The following table summarizes the pre-tax effects of the Company’s derivative instrument on income for the quarters ended October 28, 2011 and October 29, 2010:
|
Location of Loss Reclassified from
AOCL into Income (Effective Portion)
|
Amount of Loss Reclassified from AOCL into
Income (Effective Portion)
|
||||||||
|
Quarter Ended
|
|||||||||
|
October 28, 2011
|
October 29, 2010
|
||||||||
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|||||||||
|
Interest rate swaps
|
Interest expense
|
$ | 7,445 | $ | 7,595 | ||||
Any portion of the fair value of the swaps determined to be ineffective will be recognized currently in earnings. No ineffectiveness has been recorded in quarters ended October 28, 2011 and October 29, 2010.
|
6.
|
Shareholders’ Equity
|
During the quarter ended October 28, 2011, the Company received proceeds of $823 from the exercise of share-based compensation awards and the corresponding issuance of 76,161 shares of its common stock and did not make any share repurchases.
The Company paid dividends of $0.22 per common share. In addition, the Company declared a regular dividend of $0.25 per common share that was paid on November 7, 2011 and is recorded in other current liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The unrealized loss, net of tax, on the Company’s interest rate swaps decreased by $3,950 to $34,082 and is recorded in AOCL (see Notes 2, 5 and 7).
Total share-based compensation expense was $2,547. The excess tax benefit realized upon exercise of share-based compensation awards was $83.
|
7.
|
Comprehensive Income
|
Comprehensive income for the quarters ended October 28, 2011 and October 29, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Net income
|
$ | 23,802 | $ | 23,734 | ||||
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||
|
Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax expense of $312 and a tax benefit of $2,349, respectively
|
3,950 | 183 | ||||||
|
Total comprehensive income
|
$ | 27,752 | $ | 23,917 | ||||
|
8.
|
Seasonality
|
Historically, the net income of the Company has been lower in the first and third quarters and higher in the second and fourth quarters. Management attributes these variations to the Christmas holiday shopping season and the summer vacation and travel season. The Company's retail sales, which are made substantially to the Company’s restaurant customers, historically have been highest in the Company's second quarter, which includes the Christmas holiday shopping season. Historically, interstate tourist traffic and the propensity to dine out have been much higher during the summer months, thereby contributing to higher profits in the Company’s fourth quarter. The Company also generally opens additional new locations throughout the year. Therefore, the results of operations for any interim period cannot be considered indicative of the operating results for an entire year.
|
9.
|
Segment Information
|
Cracker Barrel stores represent a single, integrated operation with two related and substantially integrated product lines. The operating expenses of the restaurant and retail product lines of a Cracker Barrel store are shared and are indistinguishable in many respects. Accordingly, the Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable operating segment. All of the Company’s operations are located within the United States.
Total revenue for the quarters ended October 28, 2011 and October 29, 2010 was comprised of the following:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28, 2011
|
October 29, 2010
|
|||||||
|
Revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Restaurant
|
$ | 481,509 | $ | 481,815 | ||||
|
Retail
|
116,928 | 116,876 | ||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$ | 598,437 | $ | 598,691 | ||||
|
10.
|
Share-Based Compensation
|
Share-based compensation is recorded in general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. For the quarters ended October 28, 2011 and October 29, 2010, share-based compensation expense totaled $408 and $713, respectively, for stock options and $1,539 and $1,749 respectively, for nonvested stock. For the quarter ended October 28, 2011, share-based compensation expense for performance-based stock units totaled $600.
|
11.
|
Restructuring
|
In July 2011, as part of its cost reduction and organization streamlining initiative, the Company incurred severance charges related to the elimination of approximately 60 management and staff positions. The related severance accrual is recorded in other current liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
Liability at July 29, 2011
|
$ | 1,579 | ||
|
Payments
|
(782 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments
|
(113 | ) | ||
|
Liability at October 28, 2011
|
$ | 684 |
|
12.
|
Net Income Per Share and Weighted Average Shares
|
Basic consolidated net income per share is computed by dividing consolidated net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the reporting period. Diluted consolidated net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities, options or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock and is based upon the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the reporting period. Common equivalent shares related to stock options and nonvested stock and stock awards issued by the Company are calculated using the treasury stock method. The Company’s outstanding stock options and nonvested stock and stock awards issued by the Company represent the only dilutive effects on diluted consolidated net income per share.
The following table reconciles the components of diluted earnings per share computations:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Net income per share numerator
|
$ | 23,802 | $ | 23,734 | ||||
|
Net income per share denominator:
|
||||||||
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
22,870,934 | 22,832,393 | ||||||
|
Add potential dilution:
|
||||||||
|
Stock options and nonvested stock and stock awards
|
274,849 | 761,489 | ||||||
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
23,145,783 | 23,593,882 | ||||||
|
13.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various legal and regulatory proceedings and claims incidental to and arising out of the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, based upon information currently available, the ultimate liability with respect to these proceedings and claims will not materially affect the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.
Related to its workers’ compensation insurance coverage, the Company is contingently liable pursuant to standby letters of credit as credit guarantees to certain insurers. As of October 28, 2011, the Company had $28,706 of standby letters of credit related to securing reserved claims under workers’ compensation insurance. All standby letters of credit are renewable annually and reduce the Company’s borrowing availability under its Revolving Credit Facility (see Note 4).
In the first quarter of 2012, the Company received proceeds of $3,000 from a lawsuit settlement and recorded the proceeds as a gain that is included in other store operating expenses in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. Because the Company believed this settlement represented a gain contingency, the Company did not record such gain contingency until the settlement amount and timing were assured.
The Company is secondarily liable for lease payments under the terms of an operating lease that has been assigned to a third party. At October 28, 2011, the lease has a remaining life of approximately 1.9 years with annual lease payments of approximately $361 for a total guarantee of $691. The Company’s performance is required only if the assignee fails to perform its obligations as lessee. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe that the assignee will not perform and, therefore, no provision has been made in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for amounts to be paid in case of non-performance by the assignee.
Upon the sale of Logan’s Roadhouse, Inc. (“Logan’s”) in 2007, the Company reaffirmed its guarantee of the lease payments for two Logan’s restaurants. At October 28, 2011, the operating leases had remaining lives of 0.2 and 8.4 years with annual payments of approximately $94 and $108, respectively, for a total guarantee of $971. The Company’s performance is required only if Logan’s fails to perform its obligations as lessee. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe Logan’s will not perform, and therefore, no provision has been made in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for amounts to be paid as a result of non-performance by Logan’s.
The Company enters into certain indemnification agreements in favor of third parties in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that the probability of incurring an actual liability under such indemnification agreements is sufficiently remote so that no liability has been recorded. In connection with the divestiture of Logan’s, the Company entered into various agreements to indemnify third parties against certain tax obligations, for any breaches of representations and warranties in the applicable transaction documents and for certain costs and expenses that may arise out of specified real estate matters, including potential relocation and legal costs. The Company believes that the probability of being required to make any indemnification payments to Logan’s is remote, and therefore, no provision has been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for potential tax indemnifications.
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company,” “our” or “we”) are principally engaged in the operation and development in the United States of the Cracker Barrel Old Country StoreÒ (“Cracker Barrel”) concept. At October 28, 2011, we operated 606 Cracker Barrel stores in 42 states. All dollar amounts reported or discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) are shown in thousands, except per share amounts and certain statistical information (e.g., number of stores). References to years in MD&A are to our fiscal year unless otherwise noted.
MD&A provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial condition. MD&A should be read in conjunction with the (i) condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and (ii) financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2011 (the “2011 Form 10-K”). Except for specific historical information, many of the matters discussed in this report may express or imply projections of items such as revenues or expenditures, estimated capital expenditures, compliance with debt covenants, plans and objectives for future operations, inventory shrinkage, growth or initiatives, expected future economic performance or the expected outcome or impact of pending or threatened litigation. These and similar statements regarding events or results which we expect will or may occur in the future, are forward-looking statements that, by their nature, involve risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results and performance to differ materially from those expressed or implied by those statements. All forward-looking information is provided pursuant to the safe harbor established under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and should be evaluated in the context of these risks, uncertainties and other factors. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “trends,” “assumptions,” “target,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “opportunity,” “future,” “plans,” “goals,” “objectives,” “expectations,” “near-term,” “long-term,” “projection,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “potential,” “regular,” “should,” “projects,” “forecasts” or “continue” (or the negative or other derivatives of each of these terms) or similar terminology. We believe the assumptions underlying any forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, any of the assumptions could be inaccurate, and therefore, actual results may differ materially from those projected in or implied by the forward-looking statements. In addition to the risks of ordinary business operations, and those discussed or described in this report or in information incorporated by reference into this report, factors and risks that may result in actual results differing from this forward-looking information include, but are not limited to, those contained in Part I, Item 1A of the 2011 Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by this reference, as well as the factors described under “Critical Accounting Estimates” on pages 21-25 of the Form 10-Q or, from time to time, in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), press releases and other communications.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements made in this report, since the statements speak only as of the report’s date. Except as may be required by law, we have no obligation, and do not intend, to publicly update or revise any of these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are advised, however, to consult any future public disclosures that we may make on related subjects in reports that we file with or furnish to the SEC or in our other public disclosures.
Results of Operations
The following table highlights operating results by percentage relationships to total revenue for the quarter ended October 28, 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Total revenue
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
|
Cost of goods sold
|
31.1 | 30.0 | ||||||
|
Gross profit
|
68.9 | 70.0 | ||||||
|
Labor and related expenses
|
37.0 | 37.6 | ||||||
|
Other store operating expenses
|
18.2 | 18.7 | ||||||
|
Store operating income
|
13.7 | 13.7 | ||||||
|
General and administrative expenses
|
6.2 | 6.1 | ||||||
|
Impairment and store dispositions, net
|
-- | -- | ||||||
|
Operating income
|
7.5 | 7.6 | ||||||
|
Interest expense
|
1.9 | 2.0 | ||||||
|
Income before income taxes
|
5.6 | 5.6 | ||||||
|
Provision for income taxes
|
1.6 | 1.6 | ||||||
|
Net income
|
4.0 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||
The following tables highlight the components of total revenue in dollars and by percentage relationships to total revenue for the quarter ended October 28, 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Revenue in dollars
|
||||||||
|
Total Revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Restaurant
|
$ | 481,509 | $ | 481,815 | ||||
|
Retail
|
116,928 | 116,876 | ||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$ | 598,437 | $ | 598,691 | ||||
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Revenue by percentage relationships
|
||||||||
|
Total Revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Restaurant
|
80.5 | % | 80.5 | % | ||||
|
Retail
|
19.5 | 19.5 | ||||||
|
Total revenue
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
The following table sets forth the number of stores in operation at the beginning and end of the quarters ended October 28, 2011 and October 29, 2010, respectively:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Open at beginning of period
|
603 | 593 | ||||||
|
Open during period
|
3 | 3 | ||||||
|
Open at the end of period
|
606 | 596 | ||||||
Average unit volumes include sales of all stores. The following table highlights average unit volumes for the quarter ended October 28, 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Revenue:
|
||||||||
|
Restaurant
|
$ | 797.1 | $ | 810.5 | ||||
|
Retail
|
193.6 | 196.6 | ||||||
|
Total revenue
|
$ | 990.7 | $ | 1,007.1 | ||||
Total Revenue
Total revenue for the first quarter of 2012 was flat compared to the prior year first quarter. For the quarter, our comparable store restaurant sales decreased 1.6% and comparable store retail sales decreased 1.3% resulting in a total combined comparable store sales decrease of 1.5%. Our comparable store restaurant sales decrease consisted of a 3.8% guest traffic decrease and a 2.2% average check increase for the quarter (including a 2.1% average menu price increase). The comparable store retail sales decrease resulted from the decline in guest traffic. The total combined comparable store sales decrease in the first quarter of 2012 was partially offset by sales from newly opened stores.
During the first quarter of 2012, our guest traffic sequentially improved on a month-over-month basis throughout the quarter and we presently anticipate further improvement over the remainder of the year.
Cost of Goods Sold
The following table highlights the components of cost of goods sold in dollar amounts for the quarter ended October 28, 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year:
|
Quarter Ended
|
||||||||
|
October 28,
2011
|
October 29,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
||||||||
|
Restaurant
|
$ | 127,696 | $ | 122,381 | ||||
|
Retail
|
58,611 | 57,372 | ||||||
|
Total Cost of Goods Sold
|
$ | 186,307 | $ | 179,753 | ||||
Restaurant cost of goods sold as a percentage of restaurant revenue was 26.5% in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to 25.4% in the prior year first quarter. This increase is primarily the result of food commodity inflation of 5.5% partially offset by our menu price increase referenced above.
We presently expect the rate of commodity inflation to approximately double in 2012 as compared to 2011. We expect to partially offset the effects of food commodity inflation through a combination of menu price increases, supply contracts and other cost reduction initiatives.
Retail cost of goods sold as a percentage of retail revenue was 50.1% in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to 49.1% in the prior year first quarter. Higher retail cost of goods sold resulted primarily from an increase in freight expense resulting from higher fuel costs, a change in retail inventory valuation reserves and design costs related to proprietary products. These costs increased retail cost of goods sold as compared to the prior year by 0.5%, 0.3% and 0.1% as a percentage of retail revenue, respectively.
Labor and Related Expenses
Labor and related expenses include all direct and indirect labor and related costs incurred in store operations. Labor and related expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased during the first quarter of 2012 to 37.0% as compared to 37.6% in the first quarter of the prior year. This decrease resulted from decreases of 0.5%, 0.3% and 0.1% as a percentage of total revenue, respectively, in workers’ compensation expense, health care costs and store hourly labor partially offset by increases of 0.2% and 0.1% as a percentage of total revenue, respectively, in payroll taxes and store management compensation.
Lower workers’ compensation expense resulted from continued favorable claims experience over the prior years due to improvements in claims management over the life of the claims. These improvements were reflected in our quarterly actuarial valuation of our workers’ compensation reserves and resulted in an approximate $2,600 reduction in required reserves. We do not presently expect workers’ compensation expense to be lower than the prior year’s expense during the remaining quarters of 2012.
Health care costs in the calendar 2011 plan year were lower due to improvements in claims experience. As a result of these improvements, we negotiated with our health plan administrator and agreed to terms of a retrospectively rated group policy during the first quarter of 2012. This policy is retroactive to January 1, 2011 and provides for a reimbursement of health insurance premiums based on actual claims experience through the end of the calendar year. The terms of this policy resulted in us recording an approximate $2,500 receivable for reimbursement of certain health insurance premiums paid in prior periods of calendar 2011. We presently expect to receive additional reimbursements during the remainder of 2012 as calendar 2011 health care claims complete their development.
The decrease in store hourly labor costs of 0.1% as a percentage of total revenue resulted from improved productivity due to our enhanced labor management system and menu price increases being higher than wage inflation.
The increase in payroll taxes primarily resulted from higher state unemployment rates as compared to the prior year. The increase in store management compensation resulted primarily from new store growth partially offset by lower store bonus expense.
Other Store Operating Expenses
Other store operating expenses include all store-level operating costs, the major components of which are utilities, operating supplies, repairs and maintenance, depreciation and amortization, advertising, rent, credit card fees and general insurance.
Other store operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 18.2% in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to 18.7% in the first quarter of the prior year. This decrease resulted primarily from the settlement of ongoing litigation in the first quarter of 2012, which represented a decrease of 0.5% as a percentage of total revenue. This settlement was accounted for as a gain contingency and related to a matter previously recorded in other store operating expenses. Additionally, a 0.2% decrease as a percentage of total revenue in maintenance expense resulted from cost saving initiatives. These decreases were partially offset by a 0.1% increase as a percentage of total revenue in advertising expense which resulted primarily from higher media spending to support our new marketing messaging. We presently expect the quarterly pattern of advertising spending will be different this year compared to the prior year with the highest level of spending expected in the second quarter of 2012. This is the result of a change in advertising strategy which we expect to implement during the second quarter of 2012.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue increased to 6.2% in the first quarter of 2012 as compared to 6.1% in the first quarter of the prior year. This increase resulted from increases of 0.3% each as a percentage of total revenue in manager meeting expense and expenses related to the proxy contest with Biglari Holdings Inc. In the first quarter of 2012, we held a manager meeting conference for the first time in several years. These increases were partially offset by decreases of 0.3% and 0.1% as a percentage of total revenue, respectively, in salaries and incentive compensation. The decrease in salaries resulted primarily from the elimination of approximately 60 management and staff positions in July 2011. The decrease in incentive compensation resulted primarily from the reduction in management and staff positions in July 2011 and lower share-based compensation expense compared to the prior year’s quarter.
We presently expect to incur an additional expense of approximately $2,000 to $3,000 related to the proxy contest with Biglari Holdings Inc. over the remainder of the year, most of which we expect to incur in the second quarter of 2012.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the first quarter of 2012 was $11,135 as compared to $11,714 in the same period in the prior year. The decrease resulted primarily from lower debt outstanding.
Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for income taxes as a percent of income before income taxes was 28.9% and 29.6%, respectively, in the first quarters of 2012 and 2011. The decrease in the effective tax rate from the first quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012 resulted primarily from higher employer tax credits.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from our operations and our borrowing capacity under our $500,000 revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). Our internally generated cash, along with cash on hand at July 29, 2011, our borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility and proceeds from exercises of share-based compensation awards, were sufficient to finance all of our growth, dividend payments, working capital needs and other cash payment obligations in the first quarter of 2012.
We believe that cash at October 28, 2011, along with cash generated from our operating activities, the borrowing capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility and proceeds from exercises of share-based compensation awards will be sufficient to finance our continuing operations, our continuing expansion plans, our principal payments on our debt, our share repurchase plans and our expected dividend payments for at least the next twelve months and thereafter for the foreseeable future.
Cash Generated from Operations
Our operating activities provided net cash of $20,244 for the quarter ended October 28, 2011, which represented an increase from the $9,937 net cash used during the same period a year ago. This increase reflected lower annual bonus payments made this year and the timing of payments for accounts payable.
Borrowing Capacity and Debt Covenants
Our $750,000 credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) consists of a term loan (aggregate outstanding at October 28, 2011 was $231,250) and our Revolving Credit Facility. At October 28, 2011, we had $318,750 of outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility and we had $28,706 of standby letters of credit related to securing reserved claims under workers’ compensation insurance which reduce our borrowing availability under the Revolving Credit Facility. At October 28, 2011, we had $152,544 in borrowing availability under our Revolving Credit Facility. See Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our long-term debt.
The Credit Facility contains customary financial covenants, which are specified in the agreement and include maintenance of a maximum consolidated total leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. We presently are and expect to remain in compliance with the Credit Facility’s financial covenants for the remaining term of the facility.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures (purchase of property and equipment), net of proceeds from insurance recoveries were $18,712 for the first quarter of 2012 as compared to $18,153 during the same period a year ago. Our capital expenditures consisted primarily of costs of new store locations and capital expenditures for maintenance programs. We estimate that our capital expenditures during 2012 will be between $90,000 and $100,000. This estimate includes certain costs related to the acquisition of sites and construction of fifteen new stores that will open or have opened during 2012, as well as for acquisition and construction costs for store locations to be opened in future years and capital expenditures for maintenance programs. We intend to fund our capital expenditures with cash flows from operations and borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility, as necessary.
Share Repurchases, Dividends and Proceeds from the Exercise of Share-Based Compensation Awards
Subject to a maximum amount of $65,000, we have been authorized by our Board of Directors to repurchase shares during 2012 at the discretion of management. Our current criteria for share repurchases are that they be accretive to expected net income per share and are within the limits imposed by our Credit Facility. We did not repurchase any shares in the first quarter of 2012.
Our Credit Facility imposes restrictions on the amount of dividends we are able to pay. If there is no default then existing and the total of our availability under our Revolving Credit Facility plus our cash and cash equivalents on hand is at least $100,000, we may (1) pay cash dividends on our common stock if the aggregate amount of such dividends paid during any fiscal year is less than 15% of Consolidated EBITDA from continuing operations (as defined in the Credit Facility) during the immediately preceding fiscal year; or (2) increase our regular quarterly cash dividend in any quarter by an amount not to exceed the greater of $.01 per share or 10% of the amount of the dividend paid in the prior fiscal quarter.
During the first quarter of 2012, we paid dividends of $0.22 per share. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2012, we declared a dividend of $0.25 per share that was paid on November 7, 2011.
During the first quarter of 2012, we received proceeds of $823 from the exercise of share-based compensation awards and the corresponding issuance of 76,161 shares.
Working Capital
We had negative working capital of $13,786 at October 28, 2011 versus negative working capital of $21,188 at July 29, 2011. Working capital increased from July 29, 2011 primarily because of higher retail inventories which reflected our normal seasonal build of retail inventory to support our expected holiday sales. In the restaurant industry, virtually all sales are either for cash or third-party credit or debit card. Like many other restaurant companies, we are able to, and often do, operate with negative working capital. Restaurant inventories purchased through our principal food distributor are on terms of net zero days, while restaurant inventories purchased locally generally are financed from normal trade credit. Because of our retail gift shops, which have a lower product turnover than the restaurant business, we carry larger inventories than many other companies in the restaurant industry. Retail inventories purchased domestically generally are financed from normal trade credit, while imported retail inventories generally are purchased through wire transfers. These various trade terms are aided by rapid turnover of the restaurant inventory. Employees generally are paid on weekly or semi-monthly schedules in arrears for hours worked except for bonuses that are paid either quarterly or annually in arrears. Many other operating expenses have normal trade terms and certain expenses such as certain taxes and some benefits are deferred for longer periods of time.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Other than various operating leases, we have no other material off-balance sheet arrangements. Refer to the sub-section entitled “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” under the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” presented in the MD&A of our 2011 Form 10-K for additional information regarding our operating leases.
Material Commitments
There have been no material changes in our material commitments other than in the ordinary course of business since the end of 2011. Refer to the sub-section entitled “Material Commitments” under the section entitled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” presented in the MD&A of our 2011 Form 10-K for additional information regarding our material commitments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended accounting guidance which provides additional guidance on how to determine fair value under existing standards and expands existing disclosure requirements on a prospective basis. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We do not expect that the adoption of this accounting guidance in the third quarter of 2012 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Presentation of Comprehensive Income
In June 2011, the FASB issued amended accounting guidance which requires companies to present total comprehensive income and its components and the components of net income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two consecutive statements reporting net income and comprehensive income. This requirement eliminates the option to present components of comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity. This guidance affects only the presentation of comprehensive income and does not change the components of comprehensive income. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 on a retrospective basis. We do not expect that the adoption of this accounting guidance in the first quarter of 2013 will have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We prepare our Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends, outside advice from parties believed to be experts in such matters and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from those assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material.
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. Critical accounting estimates are those that:
|
|
·
|
management believes are most important to the accurate portrayal of both our financial condition and operating results and
|
|
|
·
|
require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
|
We consider the following accounting estimates to be most critical in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
·
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Provision for Asset Dispositions
|
|
|
·
|
Insurance Reserves
|
|
|
·
|
Retail Inventory Valuation
|
|
|
·
|
Tax Provision
|
|
|
·
|
Share-Based Compensation
|
|
|
·
|
Unredeemed Gift Cards
|
|
|
·
|
Legal Proceedings
|
Management has reviewed these critical accounting estimates and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Provision for Asset Dispositions
We assess the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the total expected future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, the carrying value is written down, for an asset to be held and used, to the estimated fair value or, for an asset to be disposed of, to the fair value, net of estimated costs of disposal. Any loss resulting from impairment is recognized by a charge to income. Judgments and estimates that we make related to the expected useful lives of long-lived assets and future cash flows are affected by factors such as changes in economic conditions and changes in operating performance. The accuracy of such provisions can vary materially from original estimates and management regularly monitors the adequacy of the provisions until final disposition occurs.
We have not made any material changes in our methodology for assessing impairments during the first quarter of 2012 and we do not believe that there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used by us to assess impairment on long-lived assets. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and fair values of long-lived assets, we may be exposed to losses that could be material.
Insurance Reserves
We self-insure a significant portion of our expected workers’ compensation and general liability insurance programs. We purchase insurance for individual workers’ compensation claims that exceed $250, $500 or $1,000 depending on the state in which the claim originates. We purchase insurance for individual general liability claims that exceed $500.
We record a liability for workers’ compensation and general liability for all unresolved claims and for an actuarially determined estimate of incurred but not reported claims at the anticipated cost to us based upon an actuarially determined reserve as of the end of our third quarter and adjust it by the actuarially determined losses and actual claims payments for the fourth quarter. The reserves and losses are determined actuarially from a range of possible outcomes within which no given estimate is more likely than any other estimate. As such, we record the actuarially determined losses at the lower end of that range and discount them to present value using a risk-free interest rate based on actuarially projected timing of payments. We also monitor actual claims development, including incurrence or settlement of individual large claims during the interim period between actuarial studies as another means of estimating the adequacy of our reserves. Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, we began performing limited scope actuarial studies on a quarterly basis to verify and/or modify our reserves.
A significant portion of our health insurance program is self-insured. For our calendar 2012 and 2011 plans, benefits for any individual (employee or dependents) in the self-insured group health program are limited to not more than $20 in any given plan year, and, in certain cases, to not more than $8 in any given year. We record a liability for the self-insured portion of our group health program for all unpaid claims based upon a loss development analysis derived from actual group health claims payment experience. Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, the fully-insured portion of our health insurance program contains a retrospective feature which could increase or decrease premiums based on actual claims experience.
Our accounting policies regarding workers’ compensation, general insurance and health insurance reserves include certain actuarial assumptions and management judgments regarding economic conditions, the frequency and severity of claims and claim development history and settlement practices. We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to establish our insurance reserves during the first quarter of 2012 and do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to calculate the insurance reserves. However, changes in these actuarial assumptions, management judgments or claims experience in the future may produce materially different amounts of expense that would be reported under these insurance programs.
Retail Inventory Valuation
Cost of goods sold includes the cost of retail merchandise sold at our stores utilizing the retail inventory method (“RIM”). Under RIM, the valuation of our retail inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value of our inventories. Inherent in the RIM calculation are certain significant management judgments and estimates, including initial markons, markups, markdowns and shrinkage, which may significantly impact the gross margin calculation as well as the ending inventory valuation.
Inventory valuation provisions are included for retail inventory obsolescence and retail inventory shrinkage. Retail inventory is reviewed on a quarterly basis for obsolescence and adjusted as appropriate based on assumptions made by management and judgment regarding inventory aging and future promotional activities. Cost of goods sold includes an estimate of shrinkage that is adjusted upon physical inventory counts. Annual physical inventory counts are conducted throughout the third and fourth quarters based upon a cyclical inventory schedule. An estimate of shrinkage is recorded for the time period between physical inventory counts by using a three-year average of the physical inventories’ results on a store-by-store basis.
We have not made any material changes in the methodologies, estimates or assumptions related to our merchandise inventories during the first quarter of 2012 and do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions in the future. However, actual obsolescence or shrinkage recorded may produce materially different amounts than we have estimated.
Tax Provision
We must make estimates of certain items that comprise our income tax provision. These estimates include effective state and local income tax rates, employer tax credits for items such as FICA taxes paid on employee tip income, Work Opportunity and Welfare to Work credits, as well as estimates related to certain depreciation and capitalization policies. Our estimates are made based on current tax laws, the best available information at the time of the provision and historical experience.
We recognize (or derecognize) a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return in the financial statements when it is more likely than not (i.e., a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that the position would be sustained (or not sustained) upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
We file our income tax returns many months after our year end. These returns are subject to audit by various federal and state governments years after the returns are filed and could be subject to differing interpretations of the tax laws. We then must assess the likelihood of successful legal proceedings or reach a settlement with the relevant taxing authority. Although we believe that the judgments and estimates used in establishing our tax provision are reasonable, an unsuccessful legal proceeding or a settlement could result in material adjustments to our Consolidated Financial Statements and our consolidated financial position (see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the 2011 Form 10-K for additional information).
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award. We recognize share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the award’s vesting period, or the date on which retirement is achieved, if shorter.
Compensation expense for performance-based awards is recognized when it is probable that the performance criteria will be met. At each reporting period, we reassess the probability of achieving the performance targets and the performance period required to meet those targets. Determining whether the performance targets will be achieved involves judgment and the estimate of expense may be revised periodically based on the probability of achieving the performance targets. Revisions are reflected in the period in which the estimate is changed. If any performance goals are not met, no compensation expense is ultimately recognized and, to the extent previously recognized, compensation expense is reversed.
If a share-based compensation award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation expense is recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification. Incremental compensation expense for vested awards is recognized immediately. For unvested awards, the sum of the incremental compensation expense and the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for the original award on the modification date is recognized over the modified service period.
Our nonvested stock grants generally vest over 2 – 5 years. Generally, the fair value of each nonvested stock grant is equal to the market price of our common stock at the date of grant reduced by the present value of expected dividends to be paid prior to the vesting period, discounted using an appropriate risk-free interest rate. Certain nonvested stock grants accrue dividends and their fair value is equal to the market price of our stock at the date of grant.
In 2011, we adopted annual long-term incentive plans that award performance-based stock units (“PBSUs”) to our executives instead of stock options. Subject to the respective executive’s continued employment, the PBSUs will be awarded at the end of the applicable three-year performance period for each annual plan. The number of PBSUs that will ultimately be awarded is based on various performance factors, including a market condition, total shareholder return, which is defined as increases in our stock price plus dividends paid during the performance period. The target number of shares will be awarded if there is no change in shareholder value during the performance period and the maximum number of shares that may be awarded is 150% of target. The probability of the actual shares expected to be awarded is considered in the grant date valuation; therefore, the expense will not be adjusted to reflect the actual units awarded. The vesting of the PBSUs is also subject to the achievement of a specified level of operating income during the performance period. If this performance goal is not met, no PBSUs will be awarded and to the extent previously recognized, compensation expense will be reversed.
The fair value of the PBSUs was determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation model, which simulates a range of possible future stock prices and estimates the probabilities of the potential payouts. The Monte-Carlo simulation model uses the average prices for the 60-consecutive calendar days beginning 30 days prior to and ending 30 days after the first business day of the performance period. This model also incorporates the following ranges of assumptions:
|
|
·
|
The expected volatility is a blend of implied volatility based on market-traded options on our stock and historical volatility of our stock over the period commensurate with the three-year performance period.
|
|
|
·
|
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate assumption commensurate with the three-year performance period.
|
|
|
·
|
The expected dividend yield is based on our current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the three-year performance period.
|
The fair value of each stock option award granted was estimated on the date of grant using a binomial lattice-based option valuation model. This model incorporates the several key assumptions including expected volatility, risk-free rate of return, expected dividend yield and the option’s expected life. Additionally, we use historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination and these assumptions are updated annually. The expected volatility, option exercise and termination assumptions involve management’s best estimates at that time, all of which affect the fair value of the option calculated by the binomial lattice-based option valuation model and, ultimately, the expense that will be recognized over the life of the option. We update the historical and implied components of the expected volatility assumption when new grants are made. The expected life is a by-product of the lattice model and is updated when new grants are made.
Compensation expense is recognized for only the portion of options that are expected to vest. Therefore, an estimated forfeiture rate derived from historical employee termination behavior, grouped by job classification, is applied against share-based compensation expense. The forfeiture rate is applied on a straight-line basis over the service (vesting) period for each separately vesting portion of the award as if the award were, in-substance, multiple awards. We update the estimated forfeiture rate to actual at each reporting period and adjust compensation expense accordingly so that the amount of compensation expense recognized at any date is at least equal to the portion of the grant-date value of the award that is vested at that date.
We have not made any material changes in our estimates or assumptions used to determine share-based compensation during the first quarter of 2012 and do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions used to determine share-based compensation expense. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to changes in share-based compensation expense that could be material.
Unredeemed Gift Cards
Unredeemed gift cards represent liabilities related to unearned income and are recorded at their expected redemption value. No revenue is recognized in connection with the point-of-sale transaction when gift cards are sold. For those states that exempt gift cards from their escheat laws, we make estimates of the ultimate unredeemed (“breakage”) gift cards in the period of the original sale and amortize this breakage over the redemption period that other gift cards historically have been redeemed by reducing the liability and recording revenue accordingly. For those states that do not exempt gift cards from their escheat laws, we record breakage in the period that gift cards are remitted to the state and reduce our liability accordingly. Any amounts remitted to states under escheat or similar laws reduce our deferred revenue liability and have no effect on revenue or expense while any amounts that we are permitted to retain are recorded as revenue. Changes in redemption behavior or management’s judgments regarding redemption trends in the future may produce materially different amounts of deferred revenue to be reported.
We have not made any material changes in the methodology used to record the deferred revenue liability for unredeemed gift cards during the first quarter of 2012 and do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be material changes in the future estimates or assumptions used to record this liability. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates or assumptions, we may be exposed to losses or gains that could be material.
Legal Proceedings
We are parties to various legal and regulatory proceedings and claims incidental to our business. In the opinion of management, however, based upon information currently available, the ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially affect our consolidated results of operations or financial position. We review outstanding claims and proceedings internally and with external counsel as necessary to assess probability of loss and for the ability to estimate loss. These assessments are re-evaluated each quarter or as new information becomes available to determine whether a reserve should be established or if any existing reserve should be adjusted. The actual cost of resolving a claim or proceeding ultimately may be substantially different than the amount of the recorded reserve. In addition, because it is not permissible under GAAP to establish a litigation reserve until the loss is both probable and estimable, in some cases there may be insufficient time to establish a reserve prior to the actual incurrence of the loss (upon verdict and judgment at trial, for example, or in the case of a quickly negotiated settlement).
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Part II, Item 7A of the 2011 Form 10-K is incorporated in this item of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by this reference. There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative market risks since July 29, 2011.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officers, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer each concluded that as of October 28, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purposes set forth in the definition thereof in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e).
There have been no changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses) during the quarter ended October 28, 2011 in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our 2011 Form 10-K.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
See Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
|
||
|
Date: 11/22/11
|
By:
|
/s/Lawrence E. Hyatt
|
|
Lawrence E. Hyatt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
|
Date: 11/22/11
|
By:
|
/s/P. Douglas Couvillion
|
|
P. Douglas Couvillion, Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
|
||
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
|
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 11, 2011 by and between Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and CBOCS, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2011)
|
|
3.1
|
Charter of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (restated for SEC filing purposes only) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i), 4.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2008)
|
|
3.2
|
Articles of Amendment to the Charter of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
4.1
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2011, between Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, which includes the form of Articles of Amendment to the Charter as Exhibit A, the form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Shares as Exhibit C (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 23, 2011)
|
|
10.1
|
Change-in-Control Agreement with Sandra B. Cochran, dated March 11, 2009, as amended September 12, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(o) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2011) †
|
|
10.2
|
Executive Employment Agreement with Sandra B. Cochran, dated as of September 12, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2011) †
|
|
10.3
|
Executive Employment Agreement with Michael A. Woodhouse, dated as of September 12, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 15, 2011) †
|
|
10.4
|
Consulting Agreement with Terry Maxwell, dated as of September 12, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ff) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 29, 2011) †
|
|
Change-in-Control Agreement with Douglas E. Barber, dated as of April 23, 2008, as amended October 19, 2011 (filed herewith) †
|
|
|
10.6
|
Change-in-Control Agreement with N.B. Forrest Shoaf, dated as of May 12, 2005, as amended October 19, 2011 †*
|
|
10.7
|
Change-in-Control Agreement with Terry Maxwell, dated as of August 14, 2006, as amended October 19, 2011 †*
|
|
10.8
|
Change-in-Control Agreement with Edward A. Greene, dated as of June 22, 2006, as amended October 19, 2011 †*
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document (filed herewith)
|
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema (filed herewith)
|
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (filed herewith)
|
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase (filed herewith)
|
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase (filed herewith)
|
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase (filed herewith)
|
*Document not filed because essentially identical in terms and conditions to Exhibit 10.5
†Denotes management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
30
Exhibit 10.5
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
RETENTION AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO RETENTION AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of October 19, 2011, is by and between Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (the “Company”) and Doug Barber (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an Employee Retention Agreement dated April 23, 2008 (the “Retention Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive mutually desire to amend the Retention Agreement to accord with the Company’s current policy regarding Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder and to make other technical changes thereto.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
1. The following language is added to the end of Section 1.2 of the Retention Agreement:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Change in Control described in this Section 1.2 does not constitute a “change in the ownership of the Company,” a “change in the effective control of the Company,” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company” as such terms are defined in Section 1.409A-3(i)(5) of the Treasury Regulations, the portion of the severance payments described in Section 3.1 of this Agreement that constitute deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) shall be paid to the Executive in installments over the same period as described in the applicable provision of Section IV.A. of the Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. Severance Benefits Policy, dated February 19, 2009, as such policy may be amended from time to time.
2. Section 1.3 of the Retention Agreement shall be stricken in its entirety and the following inserted in its stead:
1.3 “Change in Control Period” means a 2-year year period beginning the day a Change in Control occurs.
1
3. Section 2.4 of the Retention Agreement shall be stricken in its entirety and the following inserted in its stead:
2.4 Termination By You For Change in Duties or Compensation During a Change in Control Period. If during a Change in Control Period there occurs a Change in Duties or Compensation you may terminate your employment with the Company at any time within 120 days after the occurrence of the Change in Duties or Compensation, by giving to the Company not less than 30 and no more than 90 days notice of termination. Provided that you continue to work during the notice period, any reduction in your Compensation will be restored. At the option of the Company, following receipt of this notice, it may change or cure, within 30 days, the condition that you claim has caused the Change in Duties or Compensation, in which case, your rights to terminate your employment with the Company pursuant to this Section 2.4 shall cease (unless there occurs thereafter another Change in Duties or Compensation) and you shall continue in the employment of the Company notwithstanding the notice that you have given. If you terminate your employment with the Company pursuant to this Section 2.4, you shall be entitled to receive Benefits pursuant to Section 3. Your failure to provide the notice required by this Section 2.4 shall result in you having no right to receive any further compensation from the Company except for any base salary or vacation earned but not paid, plus any bonus earned and accrued by the Company through the Effective Date.
4. Section 6.4 of the Retention Agreement shall be stricken in its entirety and the following inserted in its stead:
6.4 Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes all previous oral or written agreements, understandings or arrangements between the Company and you regarding a termination of your employment with the Company or a change in your status, scope or authority and the salary, benefits or other compensation that you receive from the Company as a result of the termination of your employment with the Company in connection with a Change in Control (the “Subject Matter”), all of which are wholly terminated and canceled. This Agreement contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to the Subject Matter. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made with respect to the Subject Matter by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied in this Agreement. Any subsequent agreement relating to the Subject Matter or any modification of this Agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of the modification is sought and as is consistent with Section 409A of the Code.
2
5. Section 6.9 of the Retention Agreement shall be stricken in its entirety and the following inserted in its stead:
6.9 Certain Additional Payments by the Company.
(a) Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, if any payments or benefits that you would receive from the Company pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise (collectively, the “Payments”) would, either separately or in the aggregate, (i) constitute “parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code, and (ii) but for this sentence, be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax”), then the Payments will be equal to the Reduced Amount (defined below). The “Reduced Amount” will be either (1) the entire amount of the Payments, or (2) an amount equal to the largest portion of the Payments that would result in no portion of any of the Payments (after reduction) being subject to the Excise Tax, whichever amount after taking into account all applicable federal, state and local employment taxes, income taxes, and the Excise Tax (all computed at the highest applicable marginal rate, net of the maximum reduction in federal income taxes which could be obtained from a deduction of such state and local taxes), results in your receipt, on an after-tax basis, of the greatest amount of the Payments. If a reduction in the Payments is to be made so that the amount of the Payments equals the Reduced Amount, the Payments will be paid only to the extent permitted under the Reduced Amount alternative; provided, that in the event the Reduced Amount is paid, the cash payments set forth in Section 3.1 shall be reduced as required by the operation of this Section 6.9.
(b) The Company shall engage the accounting firm engaged by the Company for general audit purposes at least 20 business days prior to the effective date of the Change in Control to perform any calculation necessary to determine the amount, if any, payable to you pursuant to Section 3.1, as limited by this Section 6.9. If the accounting firm so engaged by the Company is also serving as accountant or auditor for the individual, entity or group that will control the Company following the Change in Control, the Company may appoint a nationally recognized accounting firm other than the accounting firm engaged by the Company for general audit purposes to make the determinations required hereunder. The Company shall bear all expenses with respect to the determinations by such accounting firm required to be made hereunder.
(c) The accounting firm engaged to make the determinations hereunder shall provide its calculations, together with detailed supporting documentation, to the Company and you within 20 days after the date on which such accounting firm has been engaged to make such determinations or within such other time period as agreed to by the Company and you. Any good faith determinations of the accounting firm made hereunder shall be final, binding and conclusive upon the Company and you.
(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing, in determining the reduction, if any, that shall occur as a result of this Section 6.9, the amounts payable or benefits to be provided to you shall be reduced such that the economic loss to you as a result of the Excise Tax elimination is minimized. In applying this principle, the reduction shall be made in a manner consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and where two economically equivalent amounts are subject to reduction but payable at different times, such amounts shall be reduced on a pro rata basis but not below zero.
3
6. A new Section 6.10 is added to the Retention Agreement which shall provide as follows:
|
|
6.10
|
Section 409A.
|
(a) Subject to the last paragraph of Section 1.2 above, the amounts provided for in Section 3.1 shall be paid in a single lump sum cash payment within 30 days after the Effective Date.
(b) Notwithstanding the other provisions hereof, this Agreement is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, to the extent applicable, and this Agreement shall be interpreted to avoid any penalty sanctions under Section 409A of the Code. Accordingly, all provisions herein, or incorporated by reference, shall be construed and interpreted to comply with Section 409A of the Code and, if necessary, any such provision shall be deemed amended to comply with Section 409A of the Code and regulations thereunder. If any payment or benefit cannot be provided or made at the time specified herein without incurring sanctions under Section 409A of the Code, then such benefit or payment shall be provided in full at the earliest time thereafter when such sanctions will not be imposed. Except to the extent permitted under Section 409A of the Code, in no event may you, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year of any payment under this Agreement. Each payment made under this Agreement shall be treated as a separate payment and the right to a series of installment payments under this Agreement is to be treated as a right to a series of separate payments.
(c) Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in this Agreement, if on the date of your termination of employment, you are a “specified employee” (as such term is defined in Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code and its corresponding regulations) as determined by the Board (or its delegate) in accordance with its “specified employee” determination policy, then all severance benefits payable to you under this Agreement that constitute deferred compensation subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code that are payable to you within the six (6) month period following your separation from service shall be postponed for a period of six (6) months following your “separation from service” with the Company (or any successor thereto). Any payments delayed pursuant to this Section 6.10(c) will be made in a lump sum on the Company’s first regularly scheduled payroll date that follows such six (6) month period or, if earlier, the date of your death, and any remaining payments required to be made under this Agreement will be paid upon the schedule otherwise applicable to such payments under this Agreement.
4
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, a termination of employment shall not be deemed to have occurred for purposes of any provision of this Agreement providing for the payment of “deferred compensation” (as such term is defined in Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder) upon or following a termination of employment unless such termination is also a “separation from service” from the Company within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code and Section 1.409A-1(h) of the Treasury Regulations and, for purposes of any such provision of this Agreement, references to a “separation,” “termination,” “termination of employment” or like terms shall mean “separation from service.”
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary, in no event shall any payment under this Agreement that constitutes “deferred compensation” for purposes of Section 409A of the Code and the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder be subject to offset by any other amount unless otherwise permitted by Section 409A of the Code.
(f) To the extent that any reimbursement, fringe benefit or other similar plan or arrangement in which you participate during the term of your employment under this Agreement or thereafter provides for a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, (1) the amount eligible for reimbursement or payment under such plan or arrangement in one calendar year may not affect the amount eligible for reimbursement or payment in any other calendar year (except that a plan providing medical or health benefits may impose a generally applicable limit on the amount that may be reimbursed or paid); (2) subject to any shorter time periods provided herein or the applicable plans or arrangements, any reimbursement or payment of an expense under such plan or arrangement must be made on or before the last day of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the expense was incurred; and (3) any such reimbursement or payment may not be subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit, all in accordance with Section 1.409A-3(i)(1)(iv) of the Treasury Regulations.
(g) For the avoidance of doubt, any payment due under this Agreement within a period following your termination of employment or other event, shall be made on a date during such period as determined by the Company in it’s sole discretion.
(Signatures appear on the next page)
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment effective as of the date first stated above.
|
CRACKER BARREL OLD COUNTRY STORE, INC.
|
||
|
By:
|
/s/N.B. Forrest Shoaf
|
|
|
Name:
|
N.B. Forrest Shoaf
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE
|
||
|
/s/Doug Barber
|
||
|
Doug Barber
|
||
6
|
EXHIBIT 31.1
|
CERTIFICATION
|
I, Sandra B. Cochran, certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.;
|
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
|
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
|
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: November 22, 2011
/s/Sandra B. Cochran
Sandra B. Cochran, President and
Chief Executive Officer
|
EXHIBIT 31.2
|
CERTIFICATION
|
I, Lawrence E. Hyatt, certify that:
|
|
1.
|
I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.;
|
|
|
2.
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
|
|
3.
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
|
|
4.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
|
|
|
(a)
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
|
|
|
(b)
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
|
|
|
(c)
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
|
|
|
(d)
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
|
|
|
5.
|
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
|
|
|
(a)
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
|
|
|
(b)
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: November 22, 2011
/s/Lawrence E. Hyatt
Lawrence E. Hyatt, Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (the “Issuer”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sandra B. Cochran, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
1.
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
|
2.
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
|
|
Date: November 22, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/Sandra B. Cochran
|
|
Sandra B. Cochran
|
||
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (the “Issuer”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lawrence E. Hyatt, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|
1.
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
|
2.
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
|
|
Date: November 22, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/Lawrence E. Hyatt
|
|
Lawrence E. Hyatt,
|
||
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|